`..<` still works and is encouraged except that it never worked inside `array`
declarations and a simple rewrite into `N-1` in the compiler turned out to be
difficult so for now at least it produces a clean error message.
Fortunately, `array[n, int]` _is_ 0-based, so that will work fine for me in
this case.
I would not be happy with array[0 .. (n-1), int].
> (Not to mention that most people prefer 'A'..'Z' over 'A'..<'Z'+1.)
I prefer `range(26, 'A')`. When you provide both length and start-point, there
is
> Be aware of Djikstra's opinion on ranges: >
> [https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD08xx/EWD831.html](https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD08xx/EWD831.html)
Oh not that again. Exclusive ranges ONLY work when you have a sentinel value
that shouldn't be
Use this:
array[MSA_BASE_GROUP_LEN, align_tag_col_t]
Run
(This is difficult to search for, so I thought I should ask the question.) I
see this warning:
.nim(101, 23) Warning: < is deprecated [Deprecated]
base*: array[0 ..
