Re: TechEmpower Web Framework Benchmarks: Round 10

2018-04-07 Thread Libman
[httpBEAST](https://github.com/dom96/httpbeast), _yaay!_

Re: TechEmpower Web Framework Benchmarks: Round 10

2018-03-24 Thread mashingan
If they only wanted to know routing time, they should try nest too [https://github.com/kedean/nest](https://github.com/kedean/nest)

Re: TechEmpower Web Framework Benchmarks: Round 10

2018-03-24 Thread bluenote
Doesn't the compiler pick up this file? [https://github.com/tbrand/which_is_the_fastest/blob/master/nim/jester/server_nim_jester.nim.cfg](https://github.com/tbrand/which_is_the_fastest/blob/master/nim/jester/server_nim_jester.nim.cfg)

Re: TechEmpower Web Framework Benchmarks: Round 10

2018-03-23 Thread dom96
This is an important lesson why benchmarks shouldn't be trusted. This benchmark doesn't compile Jester in release mode... I created a PR to fix this: [https://github.com/tbrand/which_is_the_fastest/pull/168](https://github.com/tbrand/which_is_the_fastest/pull/168)

Re: TechEmpower Web Framework Benchmarks: Round 10

2018-03-23 Thread Libman
A [new Web Frameworks benchmark](https://github.com/tbrand/which_is_the_fastest) includes Jester... Nim is ranked 12th out of 12. Now Python and even Ruby have frameworks that score better...

Re: TechEmpower Web Framework Benchmarks: Round 10

2017-06-29 Thread Libman
I'm sorry that I cannot contribute to this effort directly. I'm glad that some efforts are being made... (BTW, there's now a [TechEmpower round 15 preview](https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round15/).)

Re: TechEmpower Web Framework Benchmarks: Round 10

2017-06-22 Thread judofyr
Libman: I'm the author of Hox, and I think it would make a decent starting point for a basic web framework. The router is barebones, but probably usable for many projects; there's a hook-system which allows plugins to run code before/after. My main reason for not playing more with it was I was

Re: TechEmpower Web Framework Benchmarks: Round 10

2017-06-16 Thread dom96
> Well, the first improvement that comes to mind is actually getting the Jester > test working. huh? it does work.

Re: TechEmpower Web Framework Benchmarks: Round 10

2017-06-16 Thread neoes1um
Well, the first improvement that comes to mind is actually getting the Jester test working. [url=[https://goo.gl/lY26Kf][color=#ff]maxbet](https://goo.gl/lY26Kf\]\[color=#ff\]maxbet) มือถือ [/color][/url]

Re: TechEmpower Web Framework Benchmarks: Round 10

2017-06-12 Thread Libman
Bump for [Round 14](https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14), just in case it gives anyone some ideas... Nim web frameworks are still MIA... Random thought: [h2o](https://h2o.examp1e.net/) [[src]](https://github.com/h2o/h2o) seems to be an emerging C web server / framework

Re: TechEmpower Web Framework Benchmarks: Round 10

2016-11-28 Thread Libman
Just noticed that [Round 13](https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r13) got [published](https://www.techempower.com/blog/2016/11/16/framework-benchmarks-round-13/)... **_Nim MIA_**... 8-(