Attached patch builds racket with
libpng 1.6 which is supported as of
racket version 5.3.6
>From 8fbd8dd56e9be376eb2d54908fccd964c9990f73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Karn Kallio
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 18:08:05 -0430
Subject: [PATCH] racket: libpng 1.6 now supported
---
pkgs/top-level/all-p
The attached patch advances racket to the
newly released version 5.3.6
>From 2649832d0d6fdd91d6acae2f783bc057cc69426e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Karn Kallio
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 16:08:01 -0430
Subject: [PATCH] racket: advance version to 5.3.6.
---
pkgs/development/interpreters/racket/d
On 11 August 2013 20:30, Bjørn Forsman wrote:
> So, what to do now? Start by changing the mit license to a string and
> then wait for Eelco to decide what to do with the rest?
I took the simplest route: don't use the MIT license (for now).
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/81db5cfe0afacda0
On 11 August 2013 20:12, wrote:
> В письме от Воскресенье 11 августа 2013 16:55:54 пользователь Bjørn Forsman
> написал:
>> It seems I've committed something that breaks the channel (sorry!).
>> Hydra has these evaluation errors[1]:
>>
>> [...]
>> at `nixpkgs.linuxPackages.lttngModules.i686-linux
В письме от Воскресенье 11 августа 2013 16:55:54 пользователь Bjørn Forsman
написал:
> It seems I've committed something that breaks the channel (sorry!).
> Hydra has these evaluation errors[1]:
>
> [...]
> at `nixpkgs.linuxPackages.lttngModules.i686-linux' [nixosSrc = ...,
> nixpkgs = ..., offic
On 11 August 2013 17:21, Marc Weber wrote:
> Excerpts from Bjørn Forsman's message of Sun Aug 11 16:42:56 +0200 2013:
>> > I like being able to use a package descriptions without waiting.
>> > the gem-to-nix requires waiting.
> Then it does not care about depnedencies ? .. (not that they are alway
Excerpts from Bjørn Forsman's message of Sun Aug 11 16:42:56 +0200 2013:
> > I like being able to use a package descriptions without waiting.
> > the gem-to-nix requires waiting.
Then it does not care about depnedencies ? .. (not that they are always
helpful ...)
___
Hi,
It seems I've committed something that breaks the channel (sorry!).
Hydra has these evaluation errors[1]:
[...]
at `nixpkgs.linuxPackages.lttngModules.i686-linux' [nixosSrc = ...,
nixpkgs = ..., officialRelease = false]:
value is an attribute set while a string was expected
[...]
Unfortunate
On 11 August 2013 16:13, Marc Weber wrote:
>> The number of packages doesn't mean much to me (unless there is one
>> package per .nix file?),
> If you have to download them (always) when getting nixpkgs they may make
> a difference. So having them separate is a better choice IMHO.
>
> I like being
> The number of packages doesn't mean much to me (unless there is one
> package per .nix file?),
If you have to download them (always) when getting nixpkgs they may make
a difference. So having them separate is a better choice IMHO.
I like being able to use a package descriptions without waiting.
On 11 August 2013 14:55, Marc Weber wrote:
> ruby nix overlay:
> 1) ruby script to dump rubyforge to .nix files (50.000 packages)
>So no, I'm not going to ask to include them to nixpkgs.
The number of packages doesn't mean much to me (unless there is one
package per .nix file?), I'm more inte
ruby nix overlay:
1) ruby script to dump rubyforge to .nix files (50.000 packages)
So no, I'm not going to ask to include them to nixpkgs.
2) nix code which generates nix derivations on the fly from the dump.
3) a bash script you can source to augment your shell env so that all
packages are
Hi Marc,
Thanks for replying.
On 11 August 2013 13:58, Marc Weber wrote:
> If you want to give the ruby overlay a try .
Yes and no. I just want ruby gems available through nix, I don't
really care how the expressions are generated. The wiki[1] says I need
extra patches for ruby overlay, so
If you want to give the ruby overlay a try .
The following packages are known to it since I did the last dump
http://dpaste.com/1339292/
Marc Weber
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-
On 11 August 2013 06:49, wrote:
> В письме от Суббота 10 августа 2013 15:03:55 пользователь Bjørn Forsman
> написал:
>> When I run "gem nix --nix-file
>> pkgs/development/interpreters/ruby/generated.nix", several packages
>> get a "no hash" sha256 sum (literally!). Does anyone know why this
>> ha
Hi all,
I wanted to try running some nixos tests locally when I noticed my
package overrides don't get applied. This leads to testing a different
system config than what would be installed.
With some tracing, I found that (nixos)/lib/build-vms imports nixpkgs
using "config = {}", but with that re
16 matches
Mail list logo
