Probably, you have made a mistake in the configuration.nix. Here is my
config which enables wicd, please re-check your layout.
https://github.com/grwlf/nixpkgs/blob/local/machines/samsung-np900x3c.nix
And here is another config, this time containing NetworkManager
Hi,
I tried installing threadscope and got a nice error message, containing
many reports about ambiguous occurrences.
The relevant part of my config is (I played with commenting out different
permutations):
environment = {
systemPackages = with pkgs; [
(haskellPackages.ghcWithPackages
Hello Nixers,
After a year of hard work, I proudly want to present you NiJS: the asynchronous
package manager.
In NiJS, you can use the more popular, innovating and future proof JavaScript
language to specify package build specifications while still having most of the
useful goodies that Nix
http://sandervanderburg.blogspot.com/2014/04/asynchronous-package-management-with.html
I have discovered that the Nix expression language is complicated and
difficult to learn. Like Haskell, it has a solid theoretical foundation
and powerful features (such as laziness), but it's too hard to
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 10:52:10AM +, Marc Weber wrote:
Thus eventually its time to think about which information could be
shared. Who would join a software version documentation project
allowing people to upload the most recent version of my software is X,
and it requires Z, FOO, BAR ?
http://sandervanderburg.blogspot.com/2014/04/asynchronous-package-management-with.html
I have discovered that the Nix expression language is complicated and
difficult to learn. Like Haskell, it has a solid theoretical foundation
and powerful features (such as laziness), but it's too hard to
Bjørn Forsman bjorn.fors...@gmail.com writes:
Hi all,
Does anyone know what's up with the failing chromium build?
I reverted the upgrade for file locally.
This fixes chromium.
http://hydra.nixos.org/build/9819641/nixlog/1/tail-reload
Build error:
building
Hi Sander!
Sander van der Burg - EWI s.vanderb...@tudelft.nl skribis:
After a year of hard work, I proudly want to present you NiJS: the
asynchronous package manager.
In NiJS, you can use the more popular, innovating and future proof
JavaScript language to specify package build
I would certainly be keen to see a switch from a central nixpkgs repo to a
system whereby the nix expression comes with the package itself. Yes,
lots of details to figure out there, but I think it's preferable for a
number of reasons. Then, obviously, there are central servers where this
data
Hi,
On 01/04/14 12:11, Sander van der Burg - EWI wrote:
After a year of hard work, I proudly want to present you NiJS: the
asynchronous
package manager.
In NiJS, you can use the more popular, innovating and future proof JavaScript
language to specify package build specifications while
Awesome!
The fact that Guix can generate EMCAScript, also make it robust and future
proof. I also think we can reach even a bigger audience if we join efforts, so
we should definitely look into it!
From: nix-dev-boun...@lists.science.uu.nl
I think this is the wrong way to go. The bootstrap size for JavaScript is
huge with nodejs depending on the world. Nix is relatively small which is
nice. It's far from optimal though.
Haskell is also huge, but there are a few languages with tiny footprints. I
suggest we look at ash or maybe zsh.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Shell Turner cam.t...@gmail.com wrote:
http://sandervanderburg.blogspot.com/2014/04/asynchronous-package-management-with.html
I have discovered that the Nix expression language is complicated and
difficult to learn. Like Haskell, it has a solid theoretical
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:21:04PM +0200, Mathijs Kwik wrote:
I reverted the upgrade for file locally.
This fixes chromium.
should be fixed in 1ae4db3a80b7cd35bb9ea17464893b56664b17f9 and
51e449aabbc922faa00dc7b5cbd0f106eba7f928 and chromium now doesn't depend
on file anymore.
a!
--
aszlig
Excerpts from Matthew Sackman's message of Tue Apr 01 11:12:32 + 2014:
I'm guessing that the mechanical let's attempt to translate
$language-specific-deps-file into nix has been tried and found wanting?
I can see there's the node-packages-generated.nix, and others, but is
that approach
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 04:42:50PM +, Marc Weber wrote:
We should not be against a new option, we should think harder about
collaborating so that all targets will work - which one is the best fit
for use cases - future might tell.
Indeed. One of the things that seems (at least to me) wrong
On 1 April 2014 18:01, aszlig asz...@redmoonstudios.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:21:04PM +0200, Mathijs Kwik wrote:
I reverted the upgrade for file locally.
This fixes chromium.
should be fixed in 1ae4db3a80b7cd35bb9ea17464893b56664b17f9 and
51e449aabbc922faa00dc7b5cbd0f106eba7f928
Please think the other way round:
- most linux distributions (exceptions LFS I know about) want to install
packages
Some packages (such as gnome) have dependency information, but only
encoded in configure scripts or READMEs.
Rubyforge and PyPi (don't know what's current in python
Hi! Interesting project, but I mostly agree with Colin: asynchronous
programming is hard and in my opinion wouldn't become a 'killer
feature'. More, I am sure there are concepts in functional languages
which will overcome the callback-passing approach of JavaScript. I
think, Haskell's continuation
OK, april 1st?
2014-04-01 23:11 GMT+04:00 Sergey Mironov grr...@gmail.com:
Hi! Interesting project, but I mostly agree with Colin: asynchronous
programming is hard and in my opinion wouldn't become a 'killer
feature'. More, I am sure there are concepts in functional languages
which will
Guys,
Wasn't this replace Nix with JavaScript in a community of folks who
love purity, lazyness and high-level languages post an April's fools?
Check the date!
Or am I mistaken and is this a serious proposal?
Confused,
Gergely
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 10:43:15 -0500, Colin Putney co...@wiresong.com
Hello everbody,
It seems that my blog post caused quite a bit of discussion, which I really
appreciate!
I have decided to update my blog post with some additional notes based on the
discussion:
http://sandervanderburg.blogspot.com/2014/04/asynchronous-package-management-with.html
Hi there,
I was just trying to track down problems I have compiling some source
under NixOS, and it seems as pkg-config is causing some trouble.
That's why I wanted to bring up issue #292 again:
Broken pkg-config patch for Requires.private
Are there any plans to integrate a newer version of
Gergely Risko gerg...@risko.hu writes:
Benno, can you please clarify how do you know that ffmpeg_0_6 is a
dependency and normal ffmpeg (0.10 currently) won't fit?
+1, IIRC ffmpeg_0_10 should be fine (see PR #1636)
___
nix-dev mailing list
Hi.
On 04/02/2014 02:43 AM, Thomas Strobel wrote:
That's why I wanted to bring up issue #292 again:
Broken pkg-config patch for Requires.private
I think it's better to discuss it in the issue directly; it's even open.
Are there any plans to integrate a newer version of pkg-config and to
25 matches
Mail list logo
