On 04/07/2014 07:30 PM, Shea Levy wrote:
I had my remotes set up wrong and accidentally force pushed
I see it happens occasionally... is it possible on GitHub to forbid
force-pushes? I don't know about any use case of non-fast-forward
pushing on the central repo.
Vlada
smime.p7s
It is possible to add a post receive hook that sends out a big fat warning.
Alexander
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Vladimír Čunát vcu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/07/2014 07:30 PM, Shea Levy wrote:
I had my remotes set up wrong and accidentally force pushed
I see it happens
It might be a good idea to set up a post receive hook that does git pull on
each new revision, so it has all the commits,
and if it detects a force push, it sends an email with last commit's hash
to the list and to the commiter.
--
Кирилл Елагин
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Alexander
Yes, the problem seems to be that github does not actually execute hooks,
but allows webhooks. The hooks seems to be async, and thus pre-receive
isn't supported.
Alexander
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Vladimír Čunát vcu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/08/2014 08:27 AM, Alexander Kjeldaas wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know if Gnome3 can be used in Nixos.
I need it to test cinnamon.
Roelof
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
Cinnamon is just not there in 13.10.
I'm not really sure that mixing revisions as you do (having 13.10 system
and installing
some packages from master) is safe…
It might be better to switch to unstable and do it properly, by adding
cinnamon to systemPackages.
Or, if you want, you can maintain your
If we are still talking about 13.10, then Gnome3 was not actually supported
in NixOS,
but there was an expression for it called gnome3.
In NixOS 13.10 Gnome2 is used.
--
Кирилл Елагин
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Roelof Wobben r.wob...@home.nl wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know if Gnome3
Kirill Elagin schreef op 8-4-2014 8:55:
If we are still talking about 13.10, then Gnome3 was not actually
supported in NixOS,
but there was an expression for it called gnome3.
In NixOS 13.10 Gnome2 is used.
oke,
Then I think I have to switch to current.
Is there a manual how to do this ?
On 04/08/2014 09:01 AM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Is there a manual how to do this ?
http://nixos.org/nixos/manual/#sec-upgrading
Vlada
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
Excerpts from Raahul Kumar's message of Tue Apr 08 03:11:03 + 2014:
Thanks Marc, Kiril. Is there a way to create packages such that they don't
provide redundant files? It's a waste of bandwidth to download a file,
then be unable to use it because there is already a copy there. I guess
Hi,
Just a heads-up that starting with revision 694cc61, NixOS enables its firewall
by default. If you don't want this, you should explicitly set
networking.firewall.enable = false;
in your configuration.nix.
--
Eelco Dolstra | LogicBlox, Inc. | http://nixos.org/~eelco/
Hi Roelof, I have a deja vue,
Is it true that you asked this in 2011?
We have gnome expressions in nixpkgs, because gnome libraries are used
by some applications which compile and work (eg network manager or
such).
I'm unsure about whether gnome desktop is supported now. I think its
still not
Is there documentation for what the default firewall configuration is?
Eelco Dolstra eelco.dols...@logicblox.com writes:
Hi,
Just a heads-up that starting with revision 694cc61, NixOS enables its
firewall
by default. If you don't want this, you should explicitly set
Hi,
On 08/04/14 09:54, Marc Weber wrote:
I'll give you another useful tip: If you want to save bandwidth then
switch to binary distro. While nixos has had the ability to create
binary differences I'm unsure wether its activated/available at the
moment. It was disabled in the past. Maybe
Hi,
On 08/04/14 10:08, Malcolm Matalka wrote:
Is there documentation for what the default firewall configuration is?
Yeah, see the Firewall section in the manual:
http://nixos.org/nixos/manual/#idm140194845698704
--
Eelco Dolstra | LogicBlox, Inc. | http://nixos.org/~eelco/
Excerpts from Domen Kožar's message of Mon Apr 07 17:31:58 + 2014:
As soon as we allow more than one design pattern for sharing code between
packages,
package in my use cases means having same name and having most build
instructions be the same.
We do already have sharing for different
On 04/08/2014 10:00 AM, Marc Weber wrote:
I'm unsure about whether gnome desktop is supported now. I think its
still not (please correct me if I'm wrong). Thus try to clarify whether
you're talking about gnome libraries or the gnome desktop.
I'm quite certain gnome (=gnome2) doesn't work for
solutions:
1) push to another repository which allows seting up hooks, then sync to
github/nixos
2) don't preven this when pushing, prevent when pulling by:
git merge --ff-only or .git/config:
merge.ff
[..]
When set to only, only such fast-forward merges are allowed
Vladimr unt schreef op 8-4-2014
10:19:
On
04/08/2014 10:00 AM, Marc Weber wrote:
I'm unsure about whether gnome desktop is
supported now. I think its
still not (please correct me if I'm wrong). Thus try to clarify
On 04/06/2014 06:24 PM, Ben Franksen wrote:
How do I customize what gets put in my profile and environment?
Currently there are no options. All paths are linked into user
profiles/environments (but for a few hard-coded exceptions).
I plan some work on allowing to exclude some files from
On 04/08/2014 02:29 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
but when I do nix-build -A cinnamon-settings-daeemon in the directory
which contains the nix file I get a message that default.nix cannot be
found.
Normally, you should call nix-build in the root of the nixpkgs tree,
or supply the root by -f
Vladimír Čunát vcu...@gmail.com writes:
On 04/07/2014 11:36 AM, Kirill Elagin wrote:
So, the question is: what is the purpose of having
services.dbus.packages if those configs are considered anyway due to
packages being in systemPackages?
AFAIK there are cases where packages are not put
On 04/08/2014 09:29 PM, Mathijs Kwik wrote:
However, wouldn't it be possible to uniq/nub these lists on evaluation?
It's perfectly functional/declarative, but I don't know if derivations
are comparable (for equality).
They are comparable, as what you get in hand is practically the output
Yes, we can nub them (to be precise, it makes sense to subtract
`systemPackages` from `dbus.packages`), those lists contain
package names, not derivations.
But, why not simply require all the packages that provide DBus services to
be added to `dbus.packages`? That way we avoid duplication and
Kirill Elagin kirela...@gmail.com writes:
Yes, we can nub them (to be precise, it makes sense to subtract
`systemPackages` from `dbus.packages`), those lists contain
package names, not derivations.
Why should systemPackages be subtracted?
There are packages that I want in my path _and_ as a
Vladimír Čunát wrote:
On 04/06/2014 06:24 PM, Ben Franksen wrote:
How do I customize what gets put in my profile and environment?
Currently there are no options. All paths are linked into user
profiles/environments (but for a few hard-coded exceptions).
Ok, thanks.
I plan some work on
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Mathijs Kwik math...@bluescreen303.nlwrote:
Kirill Elagin kirela...@gmail.com writes:
Yes, we can nub them (to be precise, it makes sense to subtract
`systemPackages` from `dbus.packages`), those lists contain
package names, not derivations.
Why should
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Mathijs Kwik math...@bluescreen303.nlwrote:
I use that as much as possible.
There's really no need for a lot of packages to be in systemPackages or
in some user profile if they only provide a service and don't have lots
of often-used CLI tools. Same goes for
Eelco Dolstra wrote:
On 08/04/14 09:54, Marc Weber wrote:
Also waste of space/bandwidth always happens because:
- nixos always ships with header files for all libraries
(this could be fixed because nix supports multiple outputs)
Yeah, multiple outputs will fix this eventually
Peter Simons wrote:
When I want to reboot my box I enter 'reboot' in the prompt. And most
of the time I see unmounting /nix/store and nothings happens after
that.
I've run into this issue, too, but only sporadically. I have no idea
what might be the cause of this phenomenon. It feels
Vladimír Čunát wrote:
On 04/08/2014 02:29 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
but when I do nix-build -A cinnamon-settings-daeemon in the directory
which contains the nix file I get a message that default.nix cannot be
found.
Normally, you should call nix-build in the root of the nixpkgs tree,
or
I had the same problem, while I have been using SLiM.
I am currently using KDM, and it works OK.
You might have some other process that is not working properly with systemd.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Display_manager#Incompatibility_with_systemd
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Roelof
32 matches
Mail list logo
