Hi,
Does anyone mind if we (slowly) move binaries from $out/sbin to $out/bin?
Arguments for doing it:
1) The sbin vs bin distinction is an historic relic from the past. It
makes little sense on NixOS. (Even a normal (LSB-like) distro like
ArchLinux has already made the sbin - bin switch).
2)
I'm all for it, +1.
Wout.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Bjørn Forsman bjorn.fors...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone mind if we (slowly) move binaries from $out/sbin to $out/bin?
Arguments for doing it:
1) The sbin vs bin distinction is an historic relic from the past. It
makes little
+1 from me, too.
On 10/02/2014 07:07 PM, Wout Mertens wrote:
I'm all for it, +1.
Wout.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Bjørn Forsman bjorn.fors...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone mind if we (slowly) move binaries from $out/sbin to $out/bin?
Arguments for doing it:
1) The sbin vs
Does anyone mind if we (slowly) move binaries from $out/sbin to $out/bin?
Arguments for doing it:
1) The sbin vs bin distinction is an historic relic from the past. It
makes little sense on NixOS. (Even a normal (LSB-like) distro like
ArchLinux has already made the sbin - bin switch).
2) It's
On 2 October 2014 19:45, Michael Raskin 7c6f4...@mail.ru wrote:
[...]
I would like to ask whether moving /sbin/ contents to /bin/ contents
and creating a sbin → bin symlink is a good idea. Our initrd already
does this. For some packages many third-party tools expect them in some
directory like
I'm trying to install Nix OS onto my computer. My computer's optical drive
is broken, so I tried installing using a live usb. But when I boot from a
live usb, the only recognized harddrive is the usb. So, when I enter the
command fdisk -l, the usb is shown to be mounted on
/dev/sda and there are
