It looks like nixos is trying to run fsck after mounting the
filesystem (somehow I missed this when I looked at your e-mail
before).
I don't know what would cause this. Can you send us your
hardware-configuration.nix?
James
On 6 January 2015 at 23:47, Nikita Karetnikov nik...@karetnikov.org
On 01/09/2015 10:27 PM, Thomas Hunger wrote:
One thing that'd be useful is documenting how
pkgs/development/haskell-modules/hackage-packages.nix is regenerated and
how to fix common issues.
E.g. disabling tests done by overriding a package in
haskell-modules/configuration-common.nix. But I
Hi Thomas,
I changed my sandbox code to look like the following. Is that how it's
intended to be used?
yes, exactly. That's a very nice example. You can put that definition into a
file, say shell.nix, and run
$ nix-shell --pure shell.nix
to obtain an interactive environment that contains
This is really cool!
I changed my sandbox code to look like the following. Is that how it's
intended to be used?
{ haskellngPackages ? (import nixpkgs {}).haskellngPackages,
pkgs ? (import nixpkgs {}).pkgs }:
let
env = haskellngPackages.ghcWithPackages (p: [
p.text
p.mtl
p.transformers
The generic part of the nixpkgs expression for botan refers to both the bzip
download and the gzip download. The given hash corresponds to the gzip one
and generates a hash mismatch error. The attached patch downloads the
gzipped one to match the given hash.
From
Dear Haskellers `intersect` Nixers,
this is the first installment of a series of postings to describe technical
aspects of the re-factored Haskell infrastructure. When this is all done, I
intend to use these articles to create some kind of *gasp* user documentation
for the Nixpkgs manual. So I
One thing that'd be useful is documenting how
pkgs/development/haskell-modules/hackage-packages.nix is regenerated and
how to fix common issues.
E.g. disabling tests done by overriding a package in
haskell-modules/configuration-common.nix. But I don't understand how to
retain a specific version
Hi Peter,
this sounds very nice, thanks for all of the work you've put into
nix-haskell!
One immediate question I have is how to translate local haskell
packages (e.g. as described by [1]) into the haskellng regime. If I just
replace `haskellPackages` with `haskellngPackages` I get the following
