Vladimír Čunát vcu...@gmail.com writes:
On 01/31/2014 02:38 PM, Marco Maggesi wrote:
Which derivation contains pthread? Is it in gcc?
libpthread is part of glibc (and is pthread.h)
You don't need to add anything. I think just specifying -pthread or -lpthread
when linking does the thing.
Thomas Bereknyei tombe...@gmail.com writes:
That almost sounds like an unstable channel.
Unstable and unmaintained are two very different things.
Rather than removing unmaintained packages, can we make them available as
a
separate, opt-in channel?
I'd say that is an option, but if
Jan Malakhovski o...@oxij.org writes:
* First, this remove unmaintained policy discourages adding new
packages to the public nixpkgs by users that are unable to maintain
stuff. In the example above, I would better store the package in my
own branch than risk it being unexpectedly removed. This
Michael Raskin 7c6f4...@mail.ru writes:
Somehow, whenever updates of packages I care about were broken, it was
a simple mistake that was easy to fix separately… I think this scenario
is overly pessimistic.
Well, depends on your point of view. If you only care about a few
packages for your
Hi,
I agree with basically everything said, and I think breaking packages
with no maintainers (after the next stable branch-off, 14.0x?) would be
really good to make it obvious what is broken and is a candidate for
removal. It would also give people a chance to adopt a package they use
before it
Hi folks,
Shea Levy s...@shealevy.com writes:
That's why I opened this thread, because we have people with different
values but no one is really coming out and saying this is what I
want, this is why what's here now is bad.
I am more or less a bystander and not really active, but this caught
Hi,
Yury G. Kudryashov urkud.ur...@gmail.com writes:
Probably we should drop the tree structure (reduce the number of
categories?) and replace it by search tags + tools to query these tags.
I tend to agree, and I think it would be prudent to at least have a look
at debtags. Lot of effort
Hi,
rocon...@theorem.ca writes:
Why isn't wpa_supplicant.conf managed by NixOS?
Because it contains passwords.
Ah, I see.
For the record, I keep a /etc/nixos/wpa-supplicant.nix which I require
from configuration.nix and that says environment.etc = [ {
source = pkgs.writeText
===
--- pkgs/servers/dict/wiktionary2dict.py (revision 0)
+++ pkgs/servers/dict/wiktionary2dict.py (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,778 @@
+# Adapted to produce DICT-compatible files by Petr Rockai in 2012
+# Based on code from wiktiondict by Greg Hewgill
+import re
+import sys
+import codecs
+import
Hi,
the attached patch makes it possible to install wordnet data as a dictd
dictionary.
Petr
Index: pkgs/applications/misc/wordnet/dictd.nix
===
--- pkgs/applications/misc/wordnet/dictd.nix (revision 0)
+++
Hi,
the attached patch updates the DICT.org software, with some resistance,
to the current upstream releases. The current nixpkgs version of dictfmt
tends to SEGV on big complicated dictionaries.
Petr
Index: pkgs/servers/dict/libmaa.nix
Shea Levy s...@shealevy.com writes:
Hi Petr,
On 12/4/11 8:52 PM, Petr Rockai wrote:
Hi,
the below patch is needed to build a configuration that includes recent
SANE (scanner drivers) udev rules which mention RUN+=/path/to/script
in a comment (which breaks the check).
Yours,
Petr
12 matches
Mail list logo
