Speaking as someone that has been bitten by the non-deterministic package
IDs many times, I'm fully in favor of switching over to GHC 7.10.1 and
removing the old infrastructure. If there's anything I can do to help the
transition, let me know
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Peter Simons wrote:
>
A shame, ah well. We've got a whole year to try again. :)
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
I have also had Travis fail for dubious reasons, even with small changes
> On Jan 19, 2015 1:25 PM, "Luca Bruno" wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Michael Raskin <7c6f4...@mail.ru> wrote:
>>>
>>> >We did already some helpful steps (travis for PRs, staging and release
>>> >branche
Thank you for posting this! I was not aware such utilities existed, but it
will make managing pull requests much easier for me from here on out
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Damien Cassou
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Georges Dubus
> wrote:
> > I just realized I've never
I think dropping it is a great idea, because there's no point to the
Haskell Platform with the advantages that Nix provides. However, that being
said, I actually have tried to create a 2014.2.0.0 package for Nix but it
seems that the build system of the Haskell Platform has changed
significantly. I
