Re: [Nix-dev] Porting question

2013-11-22 Thread Roelof Wobben
From: mor...@tarn-vedra.de Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:59:26 +0100 Subject: Re: [Nix-dev] Porting question To: rwob...@hotmail.com The stuff between { ... }: are the arguments of the function you create. : in Nix creates a lambda. buildInputs

Re: [Nix-dev] Porting question

2013-11-22 Thread phreedom
On Friday, November 22, 2013 04:11:07 PM Roelof Wobben wrote: The stuff between { ... }: are the arguments of the function you create. : in Nix creates a lambda. buildInputs is the named argument to the 'mkDerivation' fuction. (To be exact, the function you create takes one argument: An

Re: [Nix-dev] Porting question

2013-11-21 Thread Roelof Wobben
To: nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl From: sim...@cryp.to Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 21:14:55 +0100 Subject: Re: [Nix-dev] Porting question Hi Roelof, I need autogen.sh instead of ./configure and sometimes a patch. the packages pkgs/os-specific/linux/lxc

Re: [Nix-dev] Porting question

2013-11-21 Thread Peter Simons
Hi Roelof, I need autogen.sh instead of ./configure and sometimes a patch. the packages pkgs/os-specific/linux/lxc/default.nix and pkgs/tools/security/tor/torsocks.nix both use the autoreconfHook, which might be what you're looking for, Also I need to install some .desktop and .services

[Nix-dev] Porting question

2013-11-21 Thread Roelof Wobben
Hello, I have read all the documentation. My end-goal is to port Cinnamon 2.x to Nixos. Therefore I need autogen.sh instead of ./configure and sometimes a patch. Also I need to install some .desktop and .services files. My question is which package can I take the best as a example for my

Re: [Nix-dev] Porting question

2013-11-21 Thread Roelof Wobben
From: phree...@yandex.ru To: nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 23:48:02 +0200 Subject: Re: [Nix-dev] Porting question On Thursday, November 21, 2013 09:09:30 PM Roelof Wobben wrote: I hope someone can explain to me the difference