Re: [Nix-dev] Travis false-positives

2014-11-07 Thread Peter Simons
Hi Georges, I think of it more as proof of concept of what CI on the pull requests can bring us than a final testing workflow. unfortunately, users submitting pull requests cannot see that the travis-ci job isn't supposed to be considered reliable. I've run into cases where people submit

Re: [Nix-dev] Travis false-positives

2014-11-05 Thread Rob Vermaas
Hi, Isn't travis a special case for the dynamic cache? It only runs 2 jobs at most and only when a PR comes in or a commit is done. Basically it's an extension of Hydra except that it builds PRs and doesn't save build products... Seems to me that it is fine for it to use the dynamic binary

Re: [Nix-dev] Travis false-positives

2014-11-05 Thread Wout Mertens
How about putting a caching proxy like Squid in front so the nars are cached? I'd be happy to set it up for you if you don't have time... On Wed, Nov 5, 2014, 09:56 Rob Vermaas rob.verm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Isn't travis a special case for the dynamic cache? It only runs 2 jobs at most

Re: [Nix-dev] Travis false-positives

2014-11-05 Thread Eelco Dolstra
Hi, On 05/11/14 12:02, Wout Mertens wrote: How about putting a caching proxy like Squid in front so the nars are cached? There already is an Apache reverse proxy in front of it. Since mod_proxy supports caching, it's probably not hard to enable it (though Hydra may need to provide the right

Re: [Nix-dev] Travis false-positives

2014-11-05 Thread Wout Mertens
On Wed Nov 05 2014 at 4:04:40 PM Eelco Dolstra eelco.dols...@logicblox.com wrote: Hi, On 05/11/14 12:02, Wout Mertens wrote: How about putting a caching proxy like Squid in front so the nars are cached? There already is an Apache reverse proxy in front of it. Since mod_proxy supports

Re: [Nix-dev] Travis false-positives

2014-11-04 Thread Wout Mertens
Isn't travis a special case for the dynamic cache? It only runs 2 jobs at most and only when a PR comes in or a commit is done. Basically it's an extension of Hydra except that it builds PRs and doesn't save build products... Seems to me that it is fine for it to use the dynamic binary cache...

Re: [Nix-dev] Travis false-positives

2014-11-02 Thread Georges Dubus
Hello I'm the one who set up travis. I usually monitor the pull requests for false positives, but I've missed this one. It is now fixed. The travis hook is there: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/maintainers/scripts/travis-nox-review-pr.sh, and it uses nox-review, which can be found

Re: [Nix-dev] Travis false-positives

2014-11-02 Thread Luca Bruno
I can try re-enable my hydra trunk-combined for this. Only x86-64, is that fine? On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Georges Dubus georges.du...@gmail.com wrote: Hello I'm the one who set up travis. I usually monitor the pull requests for false positives, but I've missed this one. It is now

[Nix-dev] Travis false-positives

2014-11-01 Thread Peter Simons
Travis-ci reports many false-positives, like that one: https://travis-ci.org/NixOS/nixpkgs/builds/39698004 This is really bad, IMHO. Who can fix this kind of error? Who is responsible for that service? Best regards, Peter ___ nix-dev mailing list

Re: [Nix-dev] Travis false-positives

2014-11-01 Thread Vladimír Čunát
Hi, speaking of travis... The logs suggest that it fetches from Hydra's dynamic cache (http://hydra.nixos.org/nar/*). Wasn't that supposed to be too stressing for everyday usage? Or am I missing something? Vladimir smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature