Peter, please comment *and give it a try*
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/967
still waiting for your feedback on whether the newer bup version suceeds
running make test on your machine. This patch also enables make test for
the existing version.
Marc Weber
I cannot reproduce the failure locally.
At least knowing whetherit happens once only or more often would be
helpful, which options do I have now?
Peter, have you had a chance to give test the build on your machine?
Marc Weber
___
nix-dev mailing list
I've updated bup adding two tests: a simple manual one which can be
implemented for all backup solutions easily, and I tried activating the
make test for bup.
The make test succeeded on my machine and on Evgeny Egorochkin's
but failed on hydra.
Is anybody depending on the tool or do I have a
I no longer use bup. People that do can probably just revert your
change locally.
I would like to warn you for bup though.
I've used it for daily backups for at least half a year.
While it never gave any errors, I noticed that repositories broke
after some time somehow.
As in: they must probably
Excerpts from Mathijs Kwik's message of Sun Sep 01 14:51:09 +0200 2013:
I would like to warn you for bup though.
I've used it for daily backups for at least half a year.
Well - I guess you should have started a new repo each month ..
I've started over a few times, thinking it was something I
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Marc Weber marco-owe...@gmx.de wrote:
Excerpts from Mathijs Kwik's message of Sun Sep 01 14:51:09 +0200 2013:
I would like to warn you for bup though.
I've used it for daily backups for at least half a year.
Well - I guess you should have started a new repo each
Hi Marc,
Is anybody depending on the tool or do I have a couple of days to
investigate?
yes, I depend on bup. Or rather, I depend on git-annex, which depends on
bup. So it would be great to keep bup in a working state.
Take care,
Peter
___
Excerpts from Peter Simons's message of Sun Sep 01 15:46:15 +0200 2013:
yes, I depend on bup. Or rather, I depend on git-annex, which depends on
bup. So it would be great to keep bup in a working state.
Should we keep both versions then, Peter?
bup works, the test suite passed here and Evgeny
Marc Weber wrote:
Should we keep both versions then, Peter?
I think it would be best to revert the update until the reason for the
test failures on Hydra has been understood.
Take care,
Peter
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
Excerpts from Peter Simons's message of Sun Sep 01 18:11:59 +0200 2013:
I think it would be best to revert the update until the reason for the
test failures on Hydra has been understood.
I cannot do it (I don't have access). So do as you wish.
I personally think its better to have two versions:
Hi Marc,
I think it would be best to revert the update until the reason for the
test failures on Hydra has been understood.
I cannot do it (I don't have access). So do as you wish.
okay, I've reverted the patch to fix the git-annex build. Please
re-submit an updated version as soon as
Peter,
I guess you've missed the point.
Even if the new version is stable and the test case works this does not
mean that upgrading is stable. So consider commenting on this point,
please.
Neither does a failing test case mean the new version is less stable
then the old - the warnings by
12 matches
Mail list logo
