On 03/05/2017 05:15 PM, David Izquierdo wrote:
> AFAIK those restrictions were recently dropped, Debian's firefox is now
> branded Firefox instead of Iceweasel. It probably should be changed in
> nixpkgs too to prevent further confusion.
IIRC it's not that easy, and the distro has to be
Mark Gardner writes:
> It is indeed. Going to the Firefox home page (
> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/) tells me "Congrats! You’re
> using the latest version of Firefox." Sorry for the confusion.
I'm so glad to hear it, thank you for getting back to us! I'm going to
Graham,
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Graham Christensen
wrote:
> Can you confirm that the version of Firefox you're running matches the
>
currently available, stable, Firefox?
>
It is indeed. Going to the Firefox home page (
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/)
David Izquierdo writes:
> AFAIK those restrictions were recently dropped, Debian's firefox is now
> branded Firefox instead of Iceweasel. It probably should be changed in
> nixpkgs too to prevent further confusion.
I've asked in #firefox on Mozilla's IRC network. They've
AFAIK those restrictions were recently dropped, Debian's firefox is now
branded Firefox instead of Iceweasel. It probably should be changed in
nixpkgs too to prevent further confusion.
On 05/03/17 16:16, Graham Christensen wrote:
Hi Mark,
As I understand it, what we ship in 16.09 is indeed
Hi Mark,
As I understand it, what we ship in 16.09 is indeed the stable version
of Firefox. However, since we build it ourselves the licensing
restrictions of Mozilla require us to not call it "Firefox" but instead
force us to call it "Nightly."
Can you confirm that the version of Firefox
On 03/05/2017 04:05 PM, Mark Gardner wrote:
> I thought that 16.09 is the stable release but Firefox Nightly was
> installed when I upgraded yesterday.
I believe this is all actually as you wish it. IIRC when you build FF
from source, it calls itself "nightly" by default. `firefox` attribute
is