Hi,
Since there will be quite a few NixOS and Guix folks at FOSDEM it would be
great to meet up. Is there some interest in arranging dinner / drinks on
Saturday evening?
Cheers,
Cillian
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
Count me in.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Cillian de Róiste
cillian.deroi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Since there will be quite a few NixOS and Guix folks at FOSDEM it would be
great to meet up. Is there some interest in arranging dinner / drinks on
Saturday evening?
Cheers,
Cillian
Cillian de Róiste cillian.deroi...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
Since there will be quite a few NixOS and Guix folks at FOSDEM it would be
great to meet up. Is there some interest in arranging dinner / drinks on
Saturday evening?
I'd love this! Just out of interest, which of us will be going?
-
Hi guys,
I am confused. According to [1] we've had a working GHC build for Linux/i686
in evaluations 8394199 and 8396207 -- immediately after the stdenv-updates
merge. Then Hydra ran a third build, [2], and that ended up being a cached
failure. Yet, there were no failed builds since the stdenv
Hi,
after an update (nixos-13.10 and nixops 1.2) and a complete cleanup
(including rm -rf ~/.nixops ~/.VirtualBox ~/Virtualbox\ VMs)
I get the following error during deployment:
$ nixops deploy
webserver creating VirtualBox VM...
webserver VBoxManage: error: Guest OS type 'Linux_64' is invalid
Hm, this seems to be related to this change:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixops/commit/e6dfd68cab8a283308cba122d2923faf3c4f05df.
I pushed a change to nixops to fix this.
Cheers,
Rob
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Marco Maggesi magg...@math.unifi.it wrote:
Hi,
after an update (nixos-13.10 and
Hi,
I'm just guessing here, but:
- there are packages, that depend on GHC, e.g. git-annex:
http://hydra.nixos.org/build/8421542
- this is the same evaluation, but the build number is smaller.
So what I think is happening:
- there is package X that build depends on GHC,
- when
