You didn't think I gave up, right?
I've created another branch, systemd2 [1] as an attempt to run nixos
stage-2 as initrd service, and pass the ball to systemd on the new root
directly.
So systemd/initrd -> stage 2 as service -> systemctl switch-root -> systemd.
PROBLEM: running nixos/tests/simpl
Hi,
so this builds OK on my machine. Looking at the way that the
native-x11-and-opengl is set up this looks like it isn’t reproducible. It seems
to blindly link whatever is on the host machine into the build environment. At
least that would explain to me that it wouldn’t work on Hydra if XCode
On 29. Aug2014, at 17:57, Christian Theune wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29. Aug2014, at 17:38, Luca Bruno wrote:
>
>> Progress: we started having 10248 failures, then at 12 Aug 8028 failures,
>> and now 6126 failures. I'd like to thank everybody. Let's keep up the good
>> work!
>> Many of the python
Hi,
On 29. Aug2014, at 17:38, Luca Bruno wrote:
> Progress: we started having 10248 failures, then at 12 Aug 8028 failures, and
> now 6126 failures. I'd like to thank everybody. Let's keep up the good work!
> Many of the python packages got banned from being built with different
> versions of
During the NixOS Sprint in Ljubljana I worked on ZHF project, mostly
tackling python packages. I'm still fighting with pypy and sqlite3, but in
general we should be down to around 300 failing builds for NixOS.
What's left are mostly kernelPackages and some haskell/ocaml stuff.
http://hydra.nixos.o
Progress: we started having 10248 failures, then at 12 Aug 8028 failures,
and now 6126 failures. I'd like to thank everybody. Let's keep up the good
work!
Many of the python packages got banned from being built with different
versions of python (e.g. python2 packages that don't build on python3).
S
On 2014-08-29 at 09:59, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
> On 08/29/2014 10:04 AM, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
>> Also, the commitment of being maintainer of a group of packages seems
>> significantly larger than for a single package. The change may rather
>> dissuade people from becoming a maintainer at all
On 08/29/2014 03:26 PM, Paul Colomiets wrote:
> Well, I'm not the committer. But I think the problem with looking to
> PR, is that there are 110 unsorted PRs. It's hard to look them all in
> one go. And it's useless that all committers look at them all. If
> there would be 11 groups of 10 PRs, it's
>On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Michael Raskin <7c6f4...@mail.ru> wrote:
>>
>> I would say that ZHF has some progress specifically because it is about
>> reasonable efforts to improve signal-to-noise.
>>
>> If we want packages to get updated, we need to merge pull requests
>> faster and not let p
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Michael Raskin <7c6f4...@mail.ru> wrote:
>
> I would say that ZHF has some progress specifically because it is about
> reasonable efforts to improve signal-to-noise.
>
> If we want packages to get updated, we need to merge pull requests
> faster and not let pull req
Many thanks, Vlad! I will study the fixes.
2014-08-29 6:30 GMT-03:00 Vladimír Čunát :
> Hi.
>
>
> On 08/28/2014 12:33 AM, Anderson Torres wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to package Tilda[1], a quake-like terminal emulator. The
>> expressions are here on my private Nixpkgs branch [2].
>
>
> Fixed and push
>Actually I think people are much more inclined to sit down and spend a
>few minutes sometimes updating a package or two from their group rather
>than putting their own name down specifically on a package and then
>having the sole burden of updating it themselves. I also think it makes
>people feel
On 08/29/2014 10:04 AM, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
> On 08/27/2014 04:35 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
>> What do you think? I think something like this is inevitable with the
>> ever-growing number of packages and users or we end up with the
>> situation like we have today, with thousands of outdated pa
uim: add anthy utf8
---
diff --git a/pkgs/tools/inputmethods/uim/default.nix
b/pkgs/tools/inputmethods/uim/default.nix
index b8ee95f..841a11d 100644
--- a/pkgs/tools/inputmethods/uim/default.nix
+++ b/pkgs/tools/inputmethods/uim/default.nix
@@ -1,7 +1,15 @@
-{stdenv, fetchurl, intltool, pkgconfig
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
> On 08/27/2014 04:35 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
>>
>> What do you think? I think something like this is inevitable with the
>> ever-growing number of packages and users or we end up with the
>> situation like we have today, with thousands
Hi.
On 08/28/2014 12:33 AM, Anderson Torres wrote:
I am trying to package Tilda[1], a quake-like terminal emulator. The
expressions are here on my private Nixpkgs branch [2].
Fixed and pushed to master, aeca8b6c3.
Vladimir
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
People may be likely to commit to being part of a group, where they can
assist as time allows, without necessarily commiting to being THE
maintainer for a particular package. So you could potentially end up with a
larger pool of people prepared to do maintenance with this model.
Alan
On Fri, Aug
On 08/27/2014 04:35 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
What do you think? I think something like this is inevitable with the
ever-growing number of packages and users or we end up with the
situation like we have today, with thousands of outdated packages
without maintainers or with inactive/busy mainta
Mateusz Kowalczyk writes:
> Hi,
>
> Some weeks ago the nixpkgs monitor[1] started to work again and the
> numbers there are worrying. I inline the numbers at the bottom.
>
> Now, there are 2000+ outdated packages with maintainers listed and 1000
> outdated without maintainers at all (and the 1600
19 matches
Mail list logo
