On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:16:27PM +, Tony wrote:
> Thanks Luca! That is very generous of you. I have a pretty beastly
> machine here so builds don't take all day but I would like to know if
> anyone is using chromium dev and beta in nixpkgs and if so why? I
> would really like to see them gone
Thanks Luca! That is very generous of you. I have a pretty beastly machine here
so builds don't take all day but I would like to know if anyone is using
chromium dev and beta in nixpkgs and if so why? I would really like to see them
gone.
Luca Bruno wrote
>I can offer my server for o
I can offer my server for on-demand building versions of chromium if needed
for x64 only.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Tony wrote:
> Hi All,
> I recently discovered the horror which is the maintenance burden on the
> chromium maintainers. For those who don't know it consists at a minimum of
>
Hi All,
I recently discovered the horror which is the maintenance burden on the
chromium maintainers. For those who don't know it consists at a minimum of
bumping major for three versions of the same source code pretty much once every
month, checking that the files do not 404, checking that the
Bravo! Nix and SmartOS are such a natural match. I'm really glad to see
this!
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:18 AM, deCube.net | Danny Wilson
wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> Today I’m excited to announce 2 new images available for running nix on
> SmartOS:
>
>
> 1) NixOS as lx-branded zone:
>
> Running NixOS i
I wouldn't recommend watching my talk, it was a bit hurried
and the demo broke for silly reasons.
> Will someone please post here once the video of the talk is hopefully
> available?
>
> TIA
> /M.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
nix-d
The required settings are in /etc/nixos/hardware-configuration.nix - not on
github, though I probably should commit it somewhere.
All packages the https://nixos.org/channels/nixos-15.09/ channel, so... yes!
On 1 feb. 2016, at 18:03, Franz Pletz wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:18:17 +0100
> "de
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:18:17 +0100
"deCube.net | Danny Wilson" wrote:
> 1) NixOS as lx-branded zone:
>
> Running NixOS in SmartOS’ container native
> linux-system-call-table-emulated environment:
> https://wiki.smartos.org/display/DOC/LX+Branded+Zones Special thanks
> to Eelco for helping me at N
Hi list!
Today I’m excited to announce 2 new images available for running nix on SmartOS:
1) NixOS as lx-branded zone:
Running NixOS in SmartOS’ container native linux-system-call-table-emulated
environment: https://wiki.smartos.org/display/DOC/LX+Branded+Zones
Special thanks to Eelco for hel
On 01/31/2016 08:38 PM, Ryan Mulligan wrote:
> How do I make a main library available to cmake sub directory builds?
I would define LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/the/directory/with/that/library
within the build.
--Vladimir
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_
Hi Yacine,
On 01/25/2016 11:15 PM, Yacine Hmito wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bear with me a minute, because I need to introduce a setup in order
> to make sense to my following questions.
>
> Say I packaged a piece of software and the derivation is written in a
> mypkg.nix file.
> I want to use the provide
Hello.
I am trying to make a nixpkgs derivation for opencc
https://github.com/BYVoid/OpenCC .
Here is my default.nix file and build log error message:
https://gist.github.com/ryantm/e0a9614b00d143e871f5 I am getting a problem
where it seems like cmake sub-directory builds can't find the main libr
12 matches
Mail list logo