Den 2011-12-30 17:36:00 skrev Marc Weber marco-owe...@gmx.de:
Shouldn't we keep portmap? Maybe we can have an option choosing what rpc
mechanism nixos should use. But I prefer keeping portmap.
Can those who know the difference write a brief summary about what the
change means and list some
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 08:03:58PM +0100, Rickard Nilsson wrote:
Den 2011-12-30 17:36:00 skrev Marc Weber marco-owe...@gmx.de:
Shouldn't we keep portmap? Maybe we can have an option choosing what rpc
mechanism nixos should use. But I prefer keeping portmap.
Can those who know the
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:36:19PM +0100, Rickard Nilsson wrote:
Hi,
In my experimentations with shared Nix stores and/or db, I needed a
working NFSv4 client, which NixOS doesn't have. So I fixed that. I
have attached two rather large patches, one for nixos and one for
nixpkgs. What I have
Shouldn't we keep portmap? Maybe we can have an option choosing what rpc
mechanism nixos should use. But I prefer keeping portmap.
Can those who know the difference write a brief summary about what the
change means and list some arguments for both ways?
Then it would be easier to judge.
I will
Hi,
In my experimentations with shared Nix stores and/or db, I needed a
working NFSv4 client, which NixOS doesn't have. So I fixed that. I have
attached two rather large patches, one for nixos and one for nixpkgs. What
I have done is, basically, that I have replaced portmap with rpcbind,
