Re: [Nix-dev] 16.03 release has been post-postponed (was: When will nixos-16.03 be ready?)

I'd estimate around 10 years of development until all of the blockers are implemented, so we might as well drop AMD64 and release for the ARM128 architecture only. On Fri, Apr 1, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > Sorry, I think that we also mentioned in the meeting that we would

Re: [Nix-dev] 16.03 release has been post-postponed (was: When will nixos-16.03 be ready?)

Could you create a meta issue in github for real release blockers? Thanks for the hard work Robin On 1 April 2016 12:22:23 CEST, "Domen Kožar" wrote: >Let's not forget removal of perl from Nix closure. > >On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Peter Simons wrote: > >>

Re: [Nix-dev] 16.03 release has been post-postponed (was: When will nixos-16.03 be ready?)

Let's not forget removal of perl from Nix closure. On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Peter Simons wrote: > Christian Kauhaus writes: > > > I wonder what the timeline is for the 16.03 release. As far as I > > understand it, it was supposed to happen in March, but odds are not >

Re: [Nix-dev] 16.03 release has been post-postponed (was: When will nixos-16.03 be ready?)

Sorry, I think that we also mentioned in the meeting that we would also have a working x32 ABI NixOS release. I'm afraid that your list is not exhaustive. On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:10:10PM +0200, Peter Simons wrote: > Christian Kauhaus writes: > > > I wonder what the timeline is for the 16.03

[Nix-dev] 16.03 release has been post-postponed (was: When will nixos-16.03 be ready?)

Christian Kauhaus writes: > I wonder what the timeline is for the 16.03 release. As far as I > understand it, it was supposed to happen in March, but odds are not > so good right now. Has anyone an idea about what it takes for the > release to happen? I have the unpleasant duty of informing