Hi Alex,
On 2 December 2013 09:43, Alex Berg chex...@gmail.com wrote:
I am interested in this topic. I don't completely understand the problem
here, but maybe I can help by discussing it.
The motivation for the addition of runtimeInputs is primarily to support
language interpreters and their
Hi Eelco,
On 2 December 2013 15:23, Eelco Dolstra eelco.dols...@logicblox.com wrote:
Hi,
On 30/11/13 16:12, Bjørn Forsman wrote:
I envision the end result to be something like this:
stdenv.mkDerivation {
name = foo-0.1;
...
buildInputs = [ python pythonPackages.jedi ];
FWIW, bash's 'exec' takes a flag (-a) to specify argv[0] as well.
On 12/02/2013 05:03 PM, Jason O'Conal wrote:
Excerpts from David Guibert's message of 2013-12-02 13:23:49 +:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Sergey Mironov grr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi! Plus one from here. I also notice
I am interested in this topic. I don't completely understand the problem
here, but maybe I can help by discussing it.
The motivation for the addition of runtimeInputs is primarily to support
language interpreters and their libraries?
I really don't like to use wrapper, this term. I feel that
Hi! Plus one from here. I also notice '.myapp-wrappers' while
alt-tab-switching tasks and it is not good for the endusers.
A note about binary programs. May we say that applying a wrapper
breaks only applications with interpreters (like python, shell, perl)
and does not affects binary
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Sergey Mironov grr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi! Plus one from here. I also notice '.myapp-wrappers' while
alt-tab-switching tasks and it is not good for the endusers.
argv0 [1] allows to run a program with a specified 0th argument.
[1]
Hi,
On 30/11/13 16:12, Bjørn Forsman wrote:
I envision the end result to be something like this:
stdenv.mkDerivation {
name = foo-0.1;
...
buildInputs = [ python pythonPackages.jedi ];
runtimeInputs = [ python pythonPackages.jedi ];
...
}
(The use of python above is
Excerpts from David Guibert's message of 2013-12-02 13:23:49 +:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Sergey Mironov grr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi! Plus one from here. I also notice '.myapp-wrappers' while
alt-tab-switching tasks and it is not good for the endusers.
argv0 [1] allows to run a
On Monday, December 02, 2013 09:23:30 AM Eelco Dolstra wrote:
An alternative that I've been thinking about is to make wrapProgram smarter
by giving it interpreter-specific backends. For instance, if the program
to be wrapped is a shell script, we don't need to generate a wrapper: we
can just
Hi all,
For a long time I've been annoyed by the side effects of wrapping
programs. Now I want to fix it.
Wrapping programs makes the help text (very often) ugly: usage:
.prog-wrapped some-option instead of usage: prog some-option.
Whenever I see such help texts I cannot help but think that our
10 matches
Mail list logo
