Phil Hagelberg wrote:
A few comments.
1. I'd prefer more '-v' in builder.sh. E.g., mkdir -pv, cp -v etc.
Good idea. I've attached an updated patch for this.
# patchPhase seems to assume you have a tarball, not a single file
patchPhase assume you have a '-p1' patch.
Makes sense.
Yury G. Kudryashov urkud.ur...@gmail.com writes:
Pushed. Sorry, forgotten that I'm using git-svn, not git-push, so didn't
added patch by Phil Hagelberg to commit-message.
No worries.
Do you want to recieve e-mails from our continuous build system?
That would be great; thank you!
-Phil
Excerpts from Phil Hagelberg's message of Wed Jan 18 02:24:11 +0100 2012:
Makes sense. Should I try to adapt it to patchPhase, or does it not
matter since it's such a simple invocation?
Either add leading a/ b/ or use
patchPhase=patch ${your-patch};
I'd not spend too much time on a patch
Hello!
I'm the author of Leiningen, the primary build tool used by Clojure
developers. I've packaged it up for nix in the attached patch.
Would this be acceptable to add to nixpkgs?
thanks,
Phil
From b9284771628c4beeefce8c28c826c98b58063ff0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Phil Hagelberg
Phil Hagelberg wrote:
Hello!
I'm the author of Leiningen, the primary build tool used by Clojure
developers. I've packaged it up for nix in the attached patch.
Would this be acceptable to add to nixpkgs?
A few comments.
1. I'd prefer more '-v' in builder.sh. E.g., mkdir -pv, cp -v etc.
A few comments.
1. I'd prefer more '-v' in builder.sh. E.g., mkdir -pv, cp -v etc.
Good idea. I've attached an updated patch for this.
# patchPhase seems to assume you have a tarball, not a single file
patchPhase assume you have a '-p1' patch.
Makes sense. Should I try to adapt it to
