Hi,
On 10/23/2011 01:32 AM, Kevin Quick wrote:
> Can anyone else confirm or refute the newer 636f201 hash value, and should
> this derivation be updated?
This has been fixed by Lluís (r29974).
--
Eelco Dolstra | http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~dolstra/
_
$ nix-env -u fossil
upgrading `fossil-1.19' to `fossil-1.20'
these derivations will be built:
/nix/store/c9c57bx4f844xbbp9b6kmfqyl1mak01k-fossil-1.20.drv
/nix/store/pswkfa2imzkiv86fwjvigcnyxr0cllph-fossil-src-20111021125253.tar.gz.drv
building path(s)
`/nix/store/7nvavh62pg103gjzy4vr65klr
