Re: [Nix-dev] upgrades and new packages

2012-02-19 Thread Peter Simons
Hi Mathijs, https://github.com/bluescreen303/nixpkgs/commit/6007ca525582aadb10acc5bd0837576cdf21531e https://github.com/bluescreen303/nixpkgs/commit/44c17436b4135546935012d282edef83ebb9e02d both patches are now committed to SVN. Thank you very much for the submissions! By the way, patches

Re: [Nix-dev] upgrades and new packages

2012-02-19 Thread Mathijs Kwik
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Peter Simons sim...@cryp.to wrote: Hi Mathijs,   https://github.com/bluescreen303/nixpkgs/commit/6007ca525582aadb10acc5bd0837576cdf21531e   https://github.com/bluescreen303/nixpkgs/commit/44c17436b4135546935012d282edef83ebb9e02d both patches are now

Re: [Nix-dev] upgrades and new packages

2012-02-08 Thread Arie Middelkoop
On 05-02-12 16:40, Mathijs Kwik wrote: [11] I don't know if there's a policy for licensed commercial software (of which the binaries aren't freely downloadable), but I packaged a nice game and I learned a bit about rpath and binaries under nixos doing so. The nix expression might serve as an

Re: [Nix-dev] upgrades and new packages

2012-02-08 Thread Marc Weber
Excerpts from Arie Middelkoop's message of Wed Feb 08 10:48:20 +0100 2012: I would for example not know when I would need to apply things like patchelf, and apparently it would be good to know about it. There might be some explanation in the Nix(pkgs) manual, but you know the problem with

Re: [Nix-dev] upgrades and new packages

2012-02-08 Thread Eelco Dolstra
On 08/02/12 10:48, Arie Middelkoop wrote: I would for example not know when I would need to apply things like patchelf, and apparently it would be good to know about it. There might be some explanation in the Nix(pkgs) manual, but you know the problem with manuals... It's in the Quick

Re: [Nix-dev] upgrades and new packages

2012-02-08 Thread Mathijs Kwik
Hi Peter, Thanks for submitting those. I made some changes to the binary-only game. It now supports the free demo version (as Arie Middelkoop suggested), and I used requireFile for supplying the acquired binaries in case you want to use the commercial version (as Yury G. Kudryashov suggested). I

Re: [Nix-dev] upgrades and new packages

2012-02-06 Thread Peter Simons
Hi Mathijs, I have committed patches 1-9. Thanks! I see no reason why 10 and 11 should not be committed, too, but since you labeled them unsure yourself I was too much of a coward to make a decision. ;-) Take care, Peter ___ nix-dev mailing list

Re: [Nix-dev] upgrades and new packages

2012-02-05 Thread Александр Цамутали
Mathijs Kwik math...@bluescreen303.nl writes: [11] I don't know if there's a policy for licensed commercial software (of which the binaries aren't freely downloadable), but I packaged a nice game and I learned a bit about rpath and binaries under nixos doing so. The nix expression might

Re: [Nix-dev] upgrades and new packages

2012-02-05 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Arie Middelkoop wrote: On 05-02-12 16:40, Mathijs Kwik wrote: [11] I don't know if there's a policy for licensed commercial software (of which the binaries aren't freely downloadable), but I packaged a nice game and I learned a bit about rpath and binaries under nixos doing so. The nix