Re: [nlug] The Watkins Super Router

2010-02-09 Thread Bill Woody
It is doubtful I will be there. I am finishing hp here in the next 30 days or so and suspect I will be in New Orleans for a long time. It figures after the Superbowl and Mardi Gras. I will "study up" on the software and look at the doc you provided again. Thanks, Bill On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:30

Re: [nlug] The Watkins Super Router

2010-02-09 Thread Chris McQuistion
Hmmm. The slideshow probably doesn't mean much to anyone who wasn't there for the presentation. I really wrote it as a presentation aid, so it is really lean on details because I talked about the details and just used the presentation to show the bullet points. I'd be happy to talk about the pro

Re: [nlug] The Watkins Super Router

2010-02-09 Thread Bill Woody
Chris, Thank you so much for putting this document together since some of us were unable to attend. I wonder if you might expand a bit on what your requirements were. I really like the price! Bill Woody On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:10 PM, wrote: > I've shared The Watkins Super > Router

[nlug] Help with Screen status line

2010-02-09 Thread Arafat Mohamed
I'm trying to get the output of a process running in Gnu Screen to display on the status line. I've done a few google searches and the only solution that I could find is to use backtick commands. The problem with running a backtick command is that I would have to set my process to run on a timer a

Re: [nlug] The Watkins Super Router

2010-02-09 Thread Chris Faulkner
That's sexy Curt 2 of my favorite firewalls in one... :) I use mainly pfSense and use squid for all the filtering so I don't really need Untangle... but that sounds like a mess... :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group. To post to thi

[nlug] The Watkins Super Router

2010-02-09 Thread cmcquistion
I've shared a document with you: The Watkins Super Router https://docs.google.com/present/edit?id=0AQl1nedkZb14ZGR2ZmpwdzhfMjRncHFzcThmNg&hl=en&invite=CPTAj5EB It's not an attachment -- it's stored online at Google Docs. To open this document, just click the link above. -- You received this

Re: [nlug] Legal Requirement for AV on Linux

2010-02-09 Thread Howard Coles Jr.
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 12:29:19 pm andrew mcelroy wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:26 PM, andrew mcelroy wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Ken Barber wrote: > >> On Feb 9, 2010, at 10:54 AM, Don Delp wrote: > >>> You can install my new antivirus. [snip] > >>> > >>> Installation

Re: [nlug] Legal Requirement for AV on Linux

2010-02-09 Thread Justin W Elam
I tend to use http://www.antivir.com/> AntiVir for virus protection. They also offer firewall, spam, and other programs for a fee. However the anti-virus is free. --- Your mileage may vary but I have been pleased when using it on Malicious WinMachine. --- The annual fee is 1000 EUR or equivalent

[nlug] Linux AV Discussion

2010-02-09 Thread Jim Peterson
Irony, perhaps, but here is a link to a linux.com article: RT @linuxdotcom: New today: Jack Wallen explores whether or not you need an anti-virus for Linux: http://bit.ly/asGIzp Jim Peterson Technology Coordinator Goodnight Memorial Library 203 S. Main St. Franklin, KY 42134 (270) 586-8397 www.

Re: [nlug] Legal Requirement for AV on Linux

2010-02-09 Thread Ken Barber
On Feb 9, 2010, at 12:26 PM, andrew mcelroy wrote: that will be 100 billion dollars. You're Dr. Evil! Cool! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group. To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this gr

Re: [nlug] Legal Requirement for AV on Linux

2010-02-09 Thread andrew mcelroy
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:26 PM, andrew mcelroy wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Ken Barber wrote: >> On Feb 9, 2010, at 10:54 AM, Don Delp wrote: >> >>> You can install my new antivirus.  [snip] >>> >>> Installation instructions: >>> sudo touch /usr/bin/DonDelpAntiVir >> >> Hey... when

Re: [nlug] Legal Requirement for AV on Linux

2010-02-09 Thread andrew mcelroy
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Ken Barber wrote: > On Feb 9, 2010, at 10:54 AM, Don Delp wrote: > >> You can install my new antivirus.  [snip] >> >> Installation instructions: >> sudo touch /usr/bin/DonDelpAntiVir > > Hey... when the Gov't demands $10,000 toilet seats, you sell 'em a $10,000 >

Re: [nlug] Legal Requirement for AV on Linux

2010-02-09 Thread Ken Barber
On Feb 9, 2010, at 10:54 AM, Don Delp wrote: > You can install my new antivirus. [snip] > > Installation instructions: > sudo touch /usr/bin/DonDelpAntiVir Hey... when the Gov't demands $10,000 toilet seats, you sell 'em a $10,000 toilet seat, right? There's good money to be made peddling bul

Re: [nlug] Legal Requirement for AV on Linux

2010-02-09 Thread Howard Coles Jr.
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 10:51:03 am Ken Barber wrote: > On Feb 9, 2010, at 9:36 AM, "Howard Coles Jr." > > wrote: > > I'm getting word from certain folks that there's a Federal Law > > requiring it. > > One word: !#$!#%^. > > S/he is probably referring to a line-item Req in a federal contra

Re: [nlug] Legal Requirement for AV on Linux

2010-02-09 Thread Don Delp
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Ken Barber wrote: > On Feb 9, 2010, at 9:36 AM, "Howard Coles Jr." wrote: > >> I'm getting word from certain folks that there's a Federal Law requiring >> it. > > One word: Bullshit. > > S/he is probably referring to a line-item Req in a federal contract > somewhe

Re: [nlug] Legal Requirement for AV on Linux

2010-02-09 Thread Ken Barber
On Feb 9, 2010, at 9:36 AM, "Howard Coles Jr." wrote: I'm getting word from certain folks that there's a Federal Law requiring it. One word: Bullshit. S/he is probably referring to a line-item Req in a federal contract somewhere. -- You received this message because you are subscribe

Re: [nlug] Legal Requirement for AV on Linux

2010-02-09 Thread andrew mcelroy
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Bucky 'Igneous' Wolfe wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Don Delp wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Howard Coles Jr. wrote: >>> I'm getting word from certain folks that there's a Federal Law requiring it. >>> I have never heard or seen of any such an

Re: [nlug] Legal Requirement for AV on Linux

2010-02-09 Thread Bucky 'Igneous' Wolfe
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Don Delp wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Howard Coles Jr. wrote: >> I'm getting word from certain folks that there's a Federal Law requiring it. >> I have never heard or seen of any such animal, but thought it just may be >> limited exposure.   Anyone else

Re: [nlug] Legal Requirement for AV on Linux

2010-02-09 Thread Don Delp
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Howard Coles Jr. wrote: > I'm getting word from certain folks that there's a Federal Law requiring it. > I have never heard or seen of any such animal, but thought it just may be > limited exposure.   Anyone else here ever hear of that? > > I guess on the topic, wer

Re: [nlug] Legal Requirement for AV on Linux

2010-02-09 Thread Jim Peterson
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 09:36 -0600, Howard Coles Jr. wrote: > I'm getting word from certain folks that there's a Federal Law requiring it. > I have never heard or seen of any such animal, but thought it just may be > limited exposure. Anyone else here ever hear of that? > > I guess on the

[nlug] Legal Requirement for AV on Linux

2010-02-09 Thread Howard Coles Jr.
I'm getting word from certain folks that there's a Federal Law requiring it. I have never heard or seen of any such animal, but thought it just may be limited exposure. Anyone else here ever hear of that? I guess on the topic, were would I go to find a good list of any, if there are any, Lin