On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 8:44 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.comwrote:
Yes, it is still on Tuesday, and (as for now) is still at 7:00 PM. We
are meeting in Medical Center North room D2221 on the Vanderbilt campus
(see http://nlug.wikispot.org/ for directions).
The overwhelming
Kevin Wurm wrote:
My vote is for earlier also. 6p or 5p
For most people, a 5 PM starting time would mean having to leave work by
4:00 PM or not much after, as that is right in the heaviest part of rush
hour. In my case, my usual work schedule is 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM,
although I can arrange to
My vote is for earlier also. 6p or 5p
Kevin W
On Jan 8, 2009, at 11:20 PM, Evan Brown nog...@gmail.com wrote:
I completely understand the reasoning and the people wanting an
earlier time. For other people though it can be harder to show up to
the meetings if they are at 6 or so, even
Wow. You commute all the way from Hoptown? That's about 1.5-2 hours
each way, isn't it? Don't they have a LUG in Clarksville or something?
Don Delp wrote:
If I get a vote, I'll take 6pm. I still might not be able to make it
often, but it'll get me back to Hopkinsville a lot earlier at
He's about in the same boat I am. I live in Franklin, KY, about 15 miles
South of Bowling Green and 35 mi North of Briley Parkway. There USED to
be a student LUG/public LUG at WKU in Bowling Green, but that's not
active (at least not by web updates, and it varies from year to year
depending on
CLUG is long defunct, as far as I can tell. I'm for an earlier meeting time
too.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Chris McQuistion cmcquist...@watkins.eduwrote:
Wow. You commute all the way from Hoptown? That's about 1.5-2 hours
each way, isn't it? Don't they have a LUG in Clarksville or
If the meeting was it 6 it would be a lot easier for me to attend.
Kent
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
NLUG group.
To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
I vote for the change, but can handle either time.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Kevin Eldridge crash...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello NLUG,
It has been said by quite a a few members at the meetings that 7pm is
too late of a start time. This is because the meetings usually last
until around
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Alex Smith (K4RNT)
shadowhun...@gmail.comwrote:
I vote for the change, but can handle either time.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Kevin Eldridge crash...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello NLUG,
It has been said by quite a a few members at the meetings that 7pm is
./aal wrote:
I would like to attend but am w/o a roadworthy car this time.
Would anyone be passing near the intersection of briley pky and murfreesboro
rd?
Al Hardigree
I live in that neighborhood.
Call me.
Russ
615/506-4070
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
Kevin Eldridge wrote:
Hello NLUG,
It has been said by quite a a few members at the meetings that 7pm is
too late of a start time. This is because the meetings usually last
until around 8:30 or 9:00pm. If we wait to eat until then, people are
starving and they do not get home until very
I would MUCH prefer an earlier start time, for the reasons you've suggested.
Chris
John F. Eldredge wrote:
Kevin Eldridge wrote:
Hello NLUG,
It has been said by quite a a few members at the meetings that 7pm is
too late of a start time. This is because the meetings usually last
until
I completely understand the reasoning and the people wanting an
earlier time. For other people though it can be harder to show up to
the meetings if they are at 6 or so, even though they leave directly
from work. That being said, it doesn't really affect me at the moment
but I can see it being a
13 matches
Mail list logo
