On Friday, November 11, 2016 at 9:44:45 PM UTC-6, Michael L wrote:
> He mentioned his current customer would be overly sensitive to their
security audit being on YouTube
That makes sense. Still, though, a scrubbed version would be nice.
Something to discuss for future meetings when I get back
He mentioned his current customer would be overly sensitive to their
security audit being on YouTube
On Nov 11, 2016 9:37 PM, "jonnyX" wrote:
> On Friday, November 11, 2016 at 7:33:37 PM UTC-6, Michael L wrote:
>
> > The presenter on security asked not to be recorded.
>
>
Understood. This is sensitive stuff in both directions. Does the
public at large need to know? Yes. Are they able to understand, in
context and rationally? Not really.
He asked we not record and we honored his request.
Howard
On 11/11/2016 09:37 PM, jonnyX wrote:
On Friday, November
On Friday, November 11, 2016 at 7:33:37 PM UTC-6, Michael L wrote:
> The presenter on security asked not to be recorded.
I have mixed feelings about that. What was the reason he gave?
~~jX
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"NLUG" group.
To post
I second that. It was a productive meeting. The presenter on security
asked not to be recorded.
On Nov 11, 2016 6:33 PM, "Howard White" wrote:
> We had < 10. The gentleman discussing Medical Device security did come
> and spoke for 45 minutes and was very good. David Wilson
We had < 10. The gentleman discussing Medical Device security did come
and spoke for 45 minutes and was very good. David Wilson was also in
attendance and since radio frequencies are how many such devices
communicate, the topic was of interest to all.
Howard
On 11/11/2016 05:58 PM, jonnyX
Anyone? Good/bad/indifferent? Comments/criticisms/requests? Attendance?
~~jX
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"NLUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to nlug-talk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to