Should nmh be RFC 2822 compliant (bug report #3356)

2003-06-27 Thread Glenn Burkhardt
Apparently the powers that be don't want informational messages to be part of the 'In-Reply-To: fields anymore (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html). The obsolete fields could look like: In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:35:24 EDT. [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is what

Re: Should nmh be RFC 2822 compliant (bug report #3356)

2003-06-27 Thread Earl Hood
On June 27, 2003 at 14:36, Glenn Burkhardt wrote: Apparently the powers that be don't want informational messages to be part of the 'In-Reply-To: fields anymore (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html). The obsolete fields could look like: In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 27 Jun 2003