slocal (v1.0.2) garbles 8bit mail parts <-- whups!

2002-09-13 Thread Doug Morris
Sorry, I just re-approved an already sent nmh-bugs post. It's a duplicate, please ignore. -- Doug Morris Morris Communications & Computer Services, Inc. http://www.mhost.com/

Re: slocal (v1.0.2) garbles 8bit mail parts

2002-09-07 Thread Neil W Rickert
Tobias Polzin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I don't like BASE64/Quoted-Printable Encoded Mails, because they >are difficult to Quote and Search with exmh/glimple. >If I use "/usr/lib/python/mimefy.py -b -d | /usr/mh/lib/slocal" >some 8bit Parts of Mails got garbled by slocal. It seems to me, >every

Re: slocal (v1.0.2) garbles 8bit mail parts

2002-09-07 Thread Earl Hood
On August 29, 2002 at 11:14, Tobias Polzin wrote: > I don't like BASE64/Quoted-Printable Encoded Mails, because they > are difficult to Quote and Search with exmh/glimple. > If I use "/usr/lib/python/mimefy.py -b -d | /usr/mh/lib/slocal" > some 8bit Parts of Mails got garbled by slocal. It seems

Re: slocal (v1.0.2) garbles 8bit mail parts

2002-09-07 Thread Tobias Polzin
> "slocal" is only one of a zillion programs that cannot properly > handle embedded '\0' characters. > > This is, at least in part, due to the unfortunate "design" of > fgets(). The problem occurs, while slocal copies the stdin to a temporary file. I patched slocal.c such that this can be done

slocal (v1.0.2) garbles 8bit mail parts

2002-09-03 Thread Tobias Polzin
I don't like BASE64/Quoted-Printable Encoded Mails, because they are difficult to Quote and Search with exmh/glimple. If I use "/usr/lib/python/mimefy.py -b -d | /usr/mh/lib/slocal" some 8bit Parts of Mails got garbled by slocal. It seems to me, everything in a line following a "zero char" (includ