Date:Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:06:08 -0700
From:Jon Steinhart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Anyone have a problem if I remove this test?
Yes.
It is that test that makes folder run in manageable time, without it,
every message in every folder has to
Jon Steinhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Oct 20, 2003:
Problem is,
the folder command doesn't work because there are no subdirectories in the
mail directory, even though there are links to them.
It is hard to imagine a Mail
Robert Elz writes:
| Anyone have a problem if I remove this test?
Yes.
It is that test that makes folder run in manageable time, without it,
every message in every folder has to be stat'd to see if it happens to
be a directory - with it, folders with no sub-folders (which almost all
Date:Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:56:55 -0700
From:Jon Steinhart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| How about if I change the test so that it is only ignored for the top
| level directory?
That would do much less harm, but is unlikely to be so easy (that
Robert Elz wrote:
| How about if I change the test so that it is only ignored for the top
| level directory?
That would do much less harm, but is unlikely to be so easy (that function
gets called for any level in the hierarchy, if I recall correctly).
An alternative would be a try