[In a message on Thu, 25 Jul 2002 16:33:58 CDT,
the pithy ruminations of [EMAIL PROTECTED] were:]
Hmmm.. I think we want to stay away from changing the syntax of
folders.
In a way that makes sense. In another, it guarentees that you won't
accidently clobber a local folder. On the
[In a message on Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:28:08 CDT,
the pithy ruminations of Chad C. Walstrom were:]
This statement doesn't quite match your examples below. The use of an
embedded language is to add access in that language to otherwise C
functions. The maintenance of state between separate
[In a message on Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:29:20 EDT,
the pithy ruminations of Michael Richardson were:]
Aside from trashing sequences (which I've experienced on occasion, no idea
why)
I've run into situations where I wind up doing an inc from two difference
sources into the same folder.
[In a message on Mon, 08 Jul 2002 15:03:37 CDT,
the pithy ruminations of Earl Hood were:]
On July 8, 2002 at 18:13, Christophe Prevotaux wrote:
That's more of a protocol issue. It's not easy to do that within the
context of POP. It _is_ possible just to get the headers within POP
[In a message on Tue, 02 Jul 2002 12:51:08 EDT,
the pithy ruminations of Michael Richardson were:]
It is enabled with --enable-sshpop.
I just noticed that the CVS site has the excellent additions in
popsbr.c for SASL authentication.
I'd like to ad SSL support, but really don't want
[In a message on Thu, 14 Mar 2002 22:08:26 EST,
chad wrote:]
I do not see this behavior using the standard MH tools on athena
(i.e. at your site). You probably wanted to report this to the local
bug reporting list (which I've cc'd), but since it doesn't seem to
affect everyone, I'll
[In a message on Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:06:50 CST,
Neil W Rickert wrote:]
I just tested, and got
6% mhpath cur
mhpath: no cur message
I get the same (nmh-1.0.4).
It seems that if the cur sequence is defined, but there is no
message of that number, mhpath will return that
[In a message on Mon, 15 May 2000 16:49:50 BST,
"Iain MacDonnell" wrote:]
John Summerfield writes:
: Presumably the concern is with possibly sensitive internal
: information being sent outside (to your home machine).
:
: Doesn't make sense to this poor old hack; how is this a greater
