Are you still sheparding this project? I remembered to look at
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/nmh
I noticed that there are outstanding bugs - I haven't had a chance to look
at the reports. Do you need help with them?
Are you still sheparding this project? I remembered to look at
Rather poorly, but yes (well, I just got back from a two week vacation in
Europe).
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/nmh
I noticed that there are outstanding bugs - I haven't had a chance to look
at the reports. Do you need
Hi. Seems like we've had a 1.1 release candidate sitting for a long
time. Can we make it a release yet? It would be nice to have something
newer than 1.0.4 going into things like Linux distributions.
Hm, well ... how about everyone (including me) makes sure what's on the
1.1 branch compiles on
I have it working on Solaris (albeit an old 2.6) and Linux RH9.
Hi. Seems like we've had a 1.1 release candidate sitting for a long
time. Can we make it a release yet? It would be nice to have something
newer than 1.0.4 going into things like Linux distributions.
Hm, well ... how about
Glenn Burkhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clues on what the test for 'broken vi' does are solicited.
The vi on some systems (including solaris) returns a non-zero
exit status if any command at all failed during the vi session.
Presumably this makes sense if vi is running in the background
from a
