While traveling, I used mail.yahoo.com and popped my mail from
mail.newt.com. What I would have preferred was to use www.newt.com to
access my MH folders directly via a web interface (since an Internet
cafe is more likely to have a browser than an ssh client) as well as
compose mail.
On July 30, 2002 at 04:31, Jerry Peek wrote:
> This is why I chose Mozilla's mail agent: it can take a whole multipart
> message and show all of it at once. (Mozilla is also more forgiving of
> some poorly-encoded messages that nmh complains about and quits.) I
> don't *always* need to see m
On July 29, 2002 at 21:00, Earl Hood wrote:
> Jerry's message seems to imply that he wants to see
> the hole message in a manner similiar to a GUI client, with images
> shown inline and convenient links to attachments (which may have nothing
> to do with HTML).
Right.
> Once in a while, it would
On July 29, 2002 at 03:39, Bryan Chan wrote:
> If you are using command-line tools to begin with, why not configure nmh to
> use a text browser like links or w3m. In ~/.mh_profile, I have:
>
> mhshow-show-text/html: %llinks %F
>
> links uses ~/.mailcap to find out how to display pictures. I fin
Jerry Peek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, all.
Hi Jerry,
> I've decided to try going back to using nmh commands like show,
> rmm, etc. as my first-pass mail interface... and to use Mozilla's
> mail agent to display the MIME messages I want to see. (I know
> that I could also use exmh. But I
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002 20:18:59 -0500
Earl Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the following bash function for dumping a message to
> Galeon:
[snip]
If you are using command-line tools to begin with, why not configure nmh to
use a text browser like links or w3m. In ~/.mh_profile, I have:
mhsh
On July 27, 2002 at 11:16, Neil W Rickert wrote:
> > But, these days, I get so much MIME mail with
> >attachments... and nmh's MIME handling is so far from what I
> >need... that I've been using the Mozilla mail agent to make the
> >first cut at reading my mail, weeding out spam, etc.
Jerry Peek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, these days, I get so much MIME mail with
>attachments... and nmh's MIME handling is so far from what I
>need... that I've been using the Mozilla mail agent to make the
>first cut at reading my mail, weeding out spam, etc... then
>using a sc
Hi, all. All this discussion about hacking nmh has gotten me
motivated to change my slacker's ;-) habits. Before I became
a slacker, I used to always use MH/nmh to read and process mail
from the command line (from a shell prompt). I love that
flexibility, and the shell is the way I like to get
