Re: nmh-agent? (was nmh and tcl)

2002-07-26 Thread Sean Kamath
[In a message on Thu, 25 Jul 2002 16:33:58 CDT, the pithy ruminations of [EMAIL PROTECTED] were:] Hmmm.. I think we want to stay away from changing the syntax of folders. In a way that makes sense. In another, it guarentees that you won't accidently clobber a local folder. On the

nmh-agent? (was nmh and tcl)

2002-07-25 Thread Chad C. Walstrom
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 11:12:02AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: More recently, the strategy that applications have used to implement (b) is to embed a language such as tcl instead. This statement doesn't quite match your examples below. The use of an embedded language is to add access in

Re: nmh-agent? (was nmh and tcl)

2002-07-25 Thread Ken Hornstein
There is one other problem with getting nmh to work over IMAP. The IMAP daemon's themselves must understand the MH format. I believe UW has mh support as a legacy, but I haven't spent enough time to get my own use of it working. Any feedback on IMAP daemons that work with the MH format. ...

Re: nmh-agent? (was nmh and tcl)

2002-07-25 Thread Sean Kamath
[In a message on Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:28:08 CDT, the pithy ruminations of Chad C. Walstrom were:] This statement doesn't quite match your examples below. The use of an embedded language is to add access in that language to otherwise C functions. The maintenance of state between separate

Re: nmh-agent? (was nmh and tcl)

2002-07-25 Thread chewie
I had meant for this reply to go to the list, but wasn't paying attention. ;-) The problem is, I want *some* folders to be on my imap server. I want some local. And I want to download some mail from some imap servers, some pop servers (actually, SSL pop/imap servers), and some local spool