I've looked at the code now and it's quite clear that the meaning of
a folderspec beginning with either dot or double dot is relative to
the current working directory, not the Path: profile entry.
Does anyone know why or have thoughts on whether these semantics should
be kept? It seems very
I've looked at the code now and it's quite clear that the meaning of
a folderspec beginning with either dot or double dot is relative to
the current working directory, not the Path: profile entry.
I've not used these forms of + (nobody on the list seems to use these
[odd] undocumented constructs]
Norman Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Feb 27, 2007:
I would also argue that the +folderName syntax for designating a file name is
strange and unique to mh.
The notation +folder for identifying a mail folder goes back at
least to ucbmail (/usr/ucb/Mail or /usr/ucb/mail or emulated by
mailx).
On February 27, 2007, Norman Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would also argue that the +folderName syntax for designating a file name is
strange and unique to mh. If, at the time is was first conceived (by Bruce
Borden) I had thought it through and had I realized that decades later people
Date:Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:01:12 -0600
From:Neil W Rickert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| The notation +folder for identifying a mail folder goes back at
| least to ucbmail (/usr/ucb/Mail or /usr/ucb/mail or emulated by
| mailx).
I wouldn't
