I have heard that a small change in the file mts/smtp/smtp.c
(of nmh 1.3) will change the mail port from 25 to 587 and get around
Verizon's port 25 block.
Does anyone have that change? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
I had the same problem (using a different ISP).
My
http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Mail/muas.html says that nmh is Ncurses-based.
Is that true? If so,What does it mean?
Norman Shapiro
798 Barron Avenue
Palo Alto CA 94306-3109
(650) 565-8215
n...@dad.org
___
Nmh-workers mailing list
No, it is not ncurses based
# ldd mhshow
libiconv.so.2 = /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.2 (0x2af0a6328000)
libtermcap.so.2 = /lib64/libtermcap.so.2 (0x2af0a6609000)
libc.so.6 = /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x2af0a680c000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
I tried the patch given by Valdis Kletnieks
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2004-08/msg8.html
I changed smtp.c (in nmh1.3) as he said to do.
But it didn't work. The no servers available error didn't occur,
but this time send just hung.
Attached is the mts.conf file.
Any ideas
It depends on what's provided on the platform. configure
searches for available libraries in this order:
termcap_curses_order=termcap curses ncurses
libtermcap.so (and libtinfo.so) can be provided by ncurses on Linux.
For info on ncurses:
http://invisible-island.net/ncurses/ncurses.faq.html
It depends on what's provided on the platform. configure
searches for available libraries in this order:
termcap_curses_order=termcap curses ncurses
I don't think that really qualifies as curses based,
using an variant of a standard library that might be provided by (n)curses.
And that is the
It depends on what's provided on the platform. configure
searches for available libraries in this order:
termcap_curses_order=termcap curses ncurses
I don't think that really qualifies as curses based,
using an variant of a standard library that might be provided by (n)curses.
I'm not
On January 22, 2010 at 11:02, Stewart W Wilson wrote:
I tried the patch given by Valdis Kletnieks
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2004-08/msg8.html
I changed smtp.c (in nmh1.3) as he said to do.
But it didn't work. The no servers available error didn't occur,
but this time
Earl wrote:
I do not know if nmh supports any authentication capabilities.
It optionally supports SASL:
Sat Jul 8 01:36:19 EDT 2000 Kimmo Suominen k...@tac.nyc.ny.us
* Applied Ken Hornstein k...@cmf.nrl.navy.mil's patches
implementing SASL support for POP3 and SMTP. If nmh
Is authentication required? Just changing the port does little
to deter spam since spammers can adapt. I would assume that
the port change also comes with the requirement that you must
specify your username and password.
The port 25 block is pretty much standard for large ISPs today; it's
to
On January 22, 2010 at 16:26, Ken Hornstein wrote:
The port 25 block is pretty much standard for large ISPs today; it's
to prevent spammers from using massive networks of compromised PCs to
deliver spam.
Changing ports is useless unless authentication is required.
If deterring spammers is the
The port 25 block is pretty much standard for large ISPs today; it's
to prevent spammers from using massive networks of compromised PCs to
deliver spam.
Changing ports is useless unless authentication is required.
If deterring spammers is the primary goal, then ISPs can just require
Earl Hood wrote:
On January 22, 2010 at 16:26, Ken Hornstein wrote:
The port 25 block is pretty much standard for large ISPs today; it's
to prevent spammers from using massive networks of compromised PCs to
deliver spam.
Changing ports is useless unless authentication is required.
If
13 matches
Mail list logo
