Hi Paul,
> i'd like to elevate at least some of those warnings to fatal errors --
> i'd like to not be able to send the message until i fix the problem.
> how might i do that?
How about altering the draft so MH dislikes it too and won't do anything
with it?
sed -i '1s/^/errors please fix\n/'
Paul wrote:
> is there a way to set up a hook of some sort, either at the whatnow
> level, or deeper in send or post, which will cause forbid sending, or
> cause sending to fail, if a set of user-defined sanity checks
> don't succeed?
>
> i use a wrapper script for my editor in mh, and the script
is there a way to set up a hook of some sort, either at the whatnow
level, or deeper in send or post, which will cause forbid sending, or
cause sending to fail, if a set of user-defined sanity checks
don't succeed?
i use a wrapper script for my editor in mh, and the script
prints warnings regardin
n...@dad.org writes:
>valdis.kletni...@vt.edu writes:
>>--==_Exmh_1335562212_1978P
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>
>>On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:48:19 -0700, n...@dad.org said:
>>> command is not executed until no other 'mhlock -all' is running, and
>>> until
>>> no relevant n
Ken Hornstein writes:
>>To make sure I understand this, I will discuss only the the -all case, which
>>is
>>all I asked for. (There would appear to be complex interactions between the
>>other cases; it would hurt my brain to understand them.)
>
>The more I look at it ... it seems that -all won't
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu writes:
>--==_Exmh_1335562212_1978P
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:48:19 -0700, n...@dad.org said:
>> command is not executed until no other 'mhlock -all' is running, and
>> until
>> no relevant nmh program is running. While
