Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 has been released!

2012-06-13 Thread Kevin Cosgrove
On 11 June 2012 at 0:42, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: I am pleased to announce the release of nmh 1.5. It is available for download here: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/nmh/nmh-1.5.tar.gz 1.5 works great on my systems. That's no surprise as RC2 and RC3 worked

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail

2012-06-13 Thread norm
David Levine levin...@acm.org writes: Norm wrote: Maybe mhmail needs a '-server servername' option and perhaps some other send options as well. Perhaps, though is that necessary? It seems that mhmail was intended to be lean. The man page recommends using comp and send for interactive use.

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail

2012-06-13 Thread Ken Hornstein
mts=/usr/local/nmh/etc/mts.conf#depends on installation sed $mts | /tmp/mts.conf -e '/^servers:/s/:.*/: localhost/' MHMTSCONF=/tmp/mts.conf mhmail norm -from norm -subject $1 I'm wondering ... do you really think these gyrations are appropriate for mhmail? Back in the day, needing to

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail

2012-06-13 Thread David Levine
Ken wrote: I'm wondering ... do you really think these gyrations are appropriate for mhmail? Back in the day, needing to change the server used by post and friends was very rare, so putting it all in mts.conf was reasonable. But now we have alternate ports and changing servers is more

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail

2012-06-13 Thread Paul Fox
n...@dad.org wrote: David Levine levin...@acm.org writes: Norm wrote: Suppose I want to do something like: mts=/usr/local/nmh/etc/mts.conf#depends on installation sed $mts | /tmp/mts.conf -e '/^servers:/s/:.*/: localhost/' MHMTSCONF=/tmp/mts.conf mhmail norm -from norm

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail

2012-06-13 Thread Ken Hornstein
Can we make send look like mhmail (mhmail with arguments, when sending)? Then mhmail could be a simple wrapper around it. The only thing we'd lose is that it would read the profile and aliases, but I don't see those as a drawback these days. If it is important, we could add an option to send to

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail

2012-06-13 Thread norm
David Levine levin...@acm.org writes: Ken wrote: I'm wondering ... do you really think these gyrations are appropriate for mhmail? Back in the day, needing to change the server used by post and friends was very rare, so putting it all in mts.conf was reasonable. But now we have alternate

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail

2012-06-13 Thread David Levine
Ken wrote: Okay, here's my thinking, for what it's worth: - send in my mind is mostly a front-end to post (or whatever you have your postproc set to). You need to give it a already-formed draft. - mhmail is more of a replacement for mailx; it does the draft composition for you. So

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail

2012-06-13 Thread Ken Hornstein
mhmail has traditionally been a front end to post, too. But it's now inadequate and it's a maintenance headache. I think that replacing it with a script that relies on send or post could solve both problems. I don't really care about the implementation details (although it occurs to me that one

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail

2012-06-13 Thread David Levine
I just committed uip/mhmail.in. It's a .in file because autoconf will eventually digest it, but it can be run as-is for now. By default, it uses post. It emulates mhmail plus passes along any post options. So this works, and ignores the server in my mts.conf: uip/mhmail.in levine -subject