Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable

David Levine levin...@acm.org writes: mhmail now has -header-field and -attach options. I'm done with it for the time being, assuming no bugs or requests. SYNOPSIS mhmail [addrs ...] [-attach file] [-body text] [-cc addrs ...] [-from addr] [-header-field name:body] [-subject subject] [switches

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable

Norm wrote: David Levine levin...@acm.org writes: SYNOPSIS mhmail [addrs ...] [-attach file] [-body text] [-cc addrs ...] [-from addr] [-header-field name:body] [-subject subject] [switches for post ... | -profile [switches for send ...]] [-resent] [-send | -nosend] [-version] [-help]

[Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?

i realized yesterday that the ever-increasing base64-ization of mail is starting to break my procmail filters, some of which look into the body of the message. i'd welcome any excuse to switch to something other than procmail, so: are there any mime-aware filtering programs out there? slocal

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable

David Levine levin...@acm.org writes: Norm wrote: David Levine levin...@acm.org writes: SYNOPSIS mhmail [addrs ...] [-attach file] [-body text] [-cc addrs ...] [-from addr] [-header-field name:body] [-subject subject] [switches for post ... | -profile [switches for send ...]] [-resent]

Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?

but i might have missed something. the sieve specification seems like it could do it, but all the implementations seem to be imap-centric, and live on the server. again, maybe i missed something. I think you're right in that slocal probably isn't worth extending to do what you want. So to keep

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable

A hyphenated switch (without long-opt beginning) seems awkard, can we add -H (a la curl) as a synonym? I might also suggest calling the header content a value rather than a body, for unambiguity's sake. Cheers! ___ Nmh-workers mailing list

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable

Norm wrote: David Levine levin...@acm.org writes: An address goes to Cc: if -cc has appeared anywhere on the command line before it, To: if not. Again, that behavior has been retained from compiled mhmail. Had I realized that, I would have suggested a, sometimes but always, redundant,

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable

Jerrad wrote: A hyphenated switch (without long-opt beginning) seems awkard, can we add -H (a la curl) as a synonym? nmh doesn't have any other -upper case switches, either. I'll change it to -headerfield, that's consistent with -draftfolder, all the -no* switches, etc. The switch can be

Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?

Paul wrote: i realized yesterday that the ever-increasing base64-ization of mail is starting to break my procmail filters, some of which look into the body of the message. I've been feeling a need for that recently, too. While I wouldn't mind moving away from procmail, this is its only

Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?

On 6/22/2012 7:53 PM, David Levine wrote: Paul wrote: i realized yesterday that the ever-increasing base64-ization of mail is starting to break my procmail filters, some of which look into the body of the message. whoa. blast from the past. I've been feeling a need for that recently, too.