Paul Vixie p...@redbarn.org writes:
i consider MH's basic mailbox format to be flawed in a MIME world for
which MH was never designed or redesigned. every attachment should be in
its own file, even if that meant that messages were directories no
longer files themselves.
note, i know we
On 2012-06-26 11:45 AM, Paul Fox wrote:
anyway: i think i still prefer the idea that the content cache
directories be kept in the message tree. but i also understand why
one might want them separate. if the idea is that the message tree
and the cache tree are roughly isomorphic, i'll bet
as an unfortunate and unnecessary burden on code whose assumptions have
been valid for a long time.
But it's still an assumption, and we know what those mean.
More seriously though, is there an actual spec for MH declaring
what valid folder and filenames are?
What's the worst-case for those using
paul wrote:
On 2012-06-26 11:45 AM, Paul Fox wrote:
anyway: i think i still prefer the idea that the content cache
directories be kept in the message tree. but i also understand why
one might want them separate. if the idea is that the message tree
and the cache tree are roughly
On 2012-06-26 3:02 AM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
int m_getfld (int state, unsigned char *name, unsigned char *buf, int
bufsz, FILE *iob)
Okay ... just shooting from the hip, and based on our discussion back
in January ... here's something (I'm ignoring how this would be
implemented for now, and
A few points on this discussion:
1) The person who promised to re-write the API was an Internet Elder.
Google it.
2) Callbacks vs data structures
One reason you might want to have callbacks is that the content might be
GPG or otherwise encrypted and you may want to prompt the user. You
On 2012-06-26 11:18 PM, Jeffrey Honig wrote:
A few points on this discussion:
1) The person who promised to re-write the API was an Internet Elder.
Google it.
and after that... bite me.
2) Callbacks vs data structures
One reason you might want to have callbacks is that the content
Paul Fox wrote:
why couldn't an indexer know the difference between the message file
and the content cache?
anyway: i think i still prefer the idea that the content cache
directories be kept in the message tree. but i also understand why
one might want them separate. if the idea is that
