Hi Jerrad,
Commands which take a folder name (inc, refile, scan, sortm, ...)
will accept the folder name in two formats: '+folder' and
'@folder'. '+folder' specifies a folder underneath the Path
defined in your nmh profile e.g; with the default '''Path:
Mail''',
lyndon wrote:
On 2012-10-15, at 7:10 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
the alphabetical listing wasn't very user friendly. this grouping may
make it easier to find related commands. (mh-chart also contains an
alphabetical list.)
mh-chart should stay as is. It's a concise list of
Is `scan +/tmp/foo' documented anywhere, i.e. the ability to treat any
directory as a folder, not just one under Path? And `@..' after that..
Doh. Was planned but slipped my mind. Here are revised versions.
1) Insert into nmh.1 near:
Commands which take a message number as an argument (
For what it's worth, it make sense to me. The only draw back is that
you cannot get an overview of it all in one screen. I might also suggest
adding sub-headings for each action group.
___
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
On 2012-10-16, at 10:59 AM, Paul Fox wrote:
heh. i should be careful what i say. i was offering to do the bulk
of the editing to nmh.1, if you could show me a few lines of how it
should be done. i wasn't really offering to revamp all the nmh
manpages.
No, no, I meant changes to just
I just pushed a new nmh.7 man page. Along with Paul's content changes, it
includes the troff source changes I am planning to make across the board.
Specifically, I'm getting rid of the .RS/.RE/.fc/.ta hackery and replacing it
with .TP tagged paragraphs. These changes also let me replace some
I just pushed a new nmh.7 man page. Along with Paul's content changes,
it includes the troff source changes I am planning to make across the
board. Specifically, I'm getting rid of the .RS/.RE/.fc/.ta hackery and
replacing it with .TP tagged paragraphs. These changes also let me
replace some of
Ken Hornstein writes:
I just pushed a new nmh.7 man page. Along with Paul's content changes,
it includes the troff source changes I am planning to make across the
board. Specifically, I'm getting rid of the .RS/.RE/.fc/.ta hackery and
replacing it with .TP tagged paragraphs. These changes
On 2012-10-16, at 8:22 PM, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
Example: I understand that .B and \fB do the
same thing, but why is the former preferred?
I don't know if they do *exactly* the same thing.
\fB says switch to the physical font named 'B' (as far as troff is concerned).
.B says I want to
There is software out there (xman, for starters) that tries to interpret
raw manpage source for its own purposes. These are not full-blown
troff interpreters, so they can barf on text that uses low-level troff
facilities.
Wait, people still USE xman? :-)
But nevertheless, thanks for your
10 matches
Mail list logo
