Re: [Nmh-workers] Should I learn nmh or GNU mailutils?

2014-02-14 Thread Oliver Kiddle
otah...@gmx.ca wrote: Thanks for the clarifications. What about ease of use, especially from a newbie perspective? Also, which scripting language would you suggest? Is there already a repository for nhm scripts? There's a good number of example scripts in Jerry Peek's MH book† though that

Re: [Nmh-workers] Should I learn nmh or GNU mailutils?

2014-02-14 Thread Joel Uckelman
Thus spake Oliver Kiddle: I've recently written scripts to create a temporary folder (using hard links) based on notmuch search results. notmuch supports MH folders, is very fast for searching and can identify threads but it's nothing like as nice to use as nmh for most other mail

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Michael Richardson
exmh was the gateway drug that got me into (n)mh usage in the 1990s. Once I realized that I wanted to compose in emacs, I switched slowly to MH-E. (That transition was 15 years ago). I also helped that my first laptop had too little ram to run X-widnows, but could run emacs in console mode (or

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Ken Hornstein
I really think you might want to consider mutt. It's not MH-specific (it also supports maildir, mbox, IMAP and probably a few others), but it certainly provides an excellent and highly customizable front-end for an MH mail repository. A word of caution: mutt has the same problem that Claws Mail

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Peter Davis
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:08:46AM -0500, Ken Hornstein wrote: I really think you might want to consider mutt. It's not MH-specific (it also supports maildir, mbox, IMAP and probably a few others), but it certainly provides an excellent and highly customizable front-end for an MH mail

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Paul Fox
otah...@gmx.ca wrote: First of all, thanks to all of you guys on this mailing list. I am learning a lot. I hope you will excuse my many questions. I was happy to find out, from Ken's last email, that there is yet another front-end for nmh whose existence I did not know of: MH-V by

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Ken Hornstein
I'm not sure how this would be an issue, unless you had multiple processes accessing the file at once, which is never the case for me. (I don't have any cron jobs fetching email. I simply fetch it when I want to read it.) A number of people have fetchmail retrieving email, or procmail feeding

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Michael Richardson
Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: Unfortunately, all of the front-ends (and IMAP servers) that claim to support MH mailboxes with their own implementation of the code only do it half-assed. People make it work, but you have to be aware of the limitations. For me, I want it

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Claire M. Connelly
o == otahler otah...@gmx.ca o The ones I came across so far (though I have not ried them o yet) are: 1) xmh (obsolete, I assume) 2) MH-E 3) exmh 4) o MH-V I started by using the command-line tools back in... 1990?* with Emacs as my editor.** Later I spent some years using exmh,

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread otahler
On 2014-02-14 15:37, Michael Richardson wrote: I can even run it (emacs+MHE) on my tablet (yes, it has a keyboard) with a debian chroot installed 20 hour of battery life, it is nice. This is slightly off topic, I know, but what tablet has a 20 hr batter life? I have never heard of

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread chad
On 13 Feb 2014, at 19:11, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: 1) xmh (obsolete, I assume) I would be shocked if people still use xmh; wasn't it written with Athena Widgets? Eww. Yeah, it was written in Xaw, but it was also written before Microsoft Windows came with network support

Re: [Nmh-workers] Should I learn nmh or GNU mailutils?

2014-02-14 Thread Ken Hornstein
There's a good number of example scripts in Jerry Peek's MH book† though that book dates from the 90s. There's no repository of nmh scripts, perhaps there should be... or something like a wiki. We have $(srcdir)/docs/contrib, and there are a few things in there now. So if you have stuff, feel

[Nmh-workers] why at ?

2014-02-14 Thread Paul Fox
this falls way down low in the pet peeve category: why is it that post, when showing me where my message is going to be delivered, says someone at example.com rather than some...@example.com? i'm guessing there's some ancient history surrounding that, but can't imagine what it might be. paul

Re: [Nmh-workers] why at ?

2014-02-14 Thread Jerrad Pierce
My guess is uucp, whichhad a ! delimited path, but there was still an intended recipient at a machine, but not @. ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

Re: [Nmh-workers] why at ?

2014-02-14 Thread Ken Hornstein
this falls way down low in the pet peeve category: why is it that post, when showing me where my message is going to be delivered, says someone at example.com rather than some...@example.com? i'm guessing there's some ancient history surrounding that, but can't imagine what it might be. That's

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
Which one would be the best bet for a newbie? We don't know your work flow. We don't know what features are important to you. We don't know anything that could help us intelligently answer the question. I suggest you just install the various front ends, run each for a while, and decide

Re: [Nmh-workers] Front-end census

2014-02-14 Thread Peter Davis
I don't want to draw this out, but mutt is *so* much faster than any other front end that anyone who wants to get through a large volume of mail quickly really should check it out. It may be that there are some potential conflicts with other MH programs, as Ken says, but it's possibly to make

Re: [Nmh-workers] why at ?

2014-02-14 Thread Paul Fox
ken wrote: this falls way down low in the pet peeve category: why is it that post, when showing me where my message is going to be delivered, says someone at example.com rather than some...@example.com? i'm guessing there's some ancient history surrounding that, but can't imagine