Conrad wrote:
> Sorry if it's bad form to reply to a 2,094-day-old message..
Not at all!
> I've been being bitten by too-long-to-post References: headers quite
> often recently; did this 2016 topic ever get resolved — does NMH have a
> mechanism for handling such long header lines now, or is it
Sorry if it's bad form to reply to a 2,094-day-old message..
I've been being bitten by too-long-to-post References: headers quite
often recently; did this 2016 topic ever get resolved — does NMH have a
mechanism for handling such long header lines now, or is it still a
question of just editing in
