I'me still backed up with unfinished tasks, piled to the rafters,
and i'm still trying to save the world for evil nternet criminals,
so alas, I have to report that I *still* having had time to go back
to read and do all of the helpful suggestions that were made to me
regarding how to get my
In message <20190710150334.894c178...@pb-smtp20.pobox.com>,
Ken Hornstein wrote:
>So, yes, lots of people DO rely on giant email providers. Why would they
>not?
In answer to your (retorical) question... privacy.
In message <20190710004749.89c1b163...@pb-smtp1.pobox.com>,
Ken Hornstein wrote:
>If I could make sendmail/pipe punch the user in the face every time a
>message was sent using it...
Please don't. I'm using it.
It is MUCH faster than trying to feed the message to Postfix
(aka Sendmail) via
In message <13507.1562541...@jinx.noi.kre.to>, you wrote:
>Date:Sun, 07 Jul 2019 12:56:13 -0700
>From: "Ronald F. Guilmette"
>Message-ID: <41320.1562529...@segfault.tristatelogic.com>
>
> | But to answer Ralph's inqui
In message <20190707172213.aeaff21...@orac.inputplus.co.uk>,
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>> > Here is what I have set. is this what you are talking about? Or do
>> > I need to fiddle sonmething else entirely?
>> >
>> > % env | fgrep LOCALE
>> > XTERM_LOCALE=en_US.UTF-8
>>
>> Yeah, that's
In message <20190703205641.363657e...@pb-smtp21.pobox.com>,
Ken Hornstein wrote:
>I think that should be pretty straightforward, with the exception we don't
>have any internal tools to show just ONE Received: line.
Perhaps this will end up being my one and only contribution
to the project.
Thanks again Ken.
I'm sure that building the port will crate a situation in which
thinks -could- all work well. But I still have all of these
mucked-up personal configuration files, both ~/.mh_profile and
also several sub-configuration files underneath my Mail/ directory.
(I wish that all this
In message <20190703182013.00a75153...@pb-smtp2.pobox.com>,
Ken Hornstein wrote:
>So, circling back to this ...
>
>Ronald, I was communicating with Cy Schubert, the maintainer of the FreeBSD
>nmh port, and he said to me, "Hey, did you realize that we DO all of the
>stuff to make replyfilter
In message <2180-1561898527.224...@mszx.gafd.XHR7>,
David Levine wrote:
>rfg wrote:
>
>> Anyway, this is most definitely NOT working. Look at this, which I cut
>> and pasted from my xterm window when I tried to do a repl:
>
>Does this work better?
>
> repl -filter mhl.replywithoutbody
In message <20190628144427.4845f70...@pb-smtp20.pobox.com>,
Ken Hornstein wrote:
>Ok, these things are not hard.
Speak for yourself! My little pea brain is still trying to grok all this.
>First, delete the entries for showproc and showmimeproc; the defaults
>for these programs are fine (they
In message <20190628004843.96a946c...@pb-smtp20.pobox.com>,
Ken Hornstein wrote:
>>> - replfilter depends on 'par', which users may not have installed,
FreeBSD comes with a tool called "fmt" pre-installed, so I guess I need
to use that in place of par, yes?
OK, so where do I make that
Catching up on my emails...
In message <7376.1561672209@localhost>,
Michael Richardson wrote:
>Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> Quite simply, all I would wish for would be something that would
> -properly-
>> convert -both- HTMLized emails -and- "Cont
In message ,
Conrad Hughes wrote:
> - replfilter depends on 'par', which users may not have installed, but
U... I don't have that either. What is it and where do I get it?
>Finally, I'd almost be inclined to have nmh-without-replfilter display a
>message about replfilter, for example
In message <20190627232032.737b9159...@pb-smtp1.pobox.com>,
Ken Hornstein wrote:
>>I had just sort-of jury-rigged my own very local and very idiosyncratic
>>mechanism for dealing with the problem/issue some years ago, and I have
>>been just trying to struggle along with it for all this time
In message <20190627202344.7389f...@enterprise.home.antispaceman.com>,
spaceman wrote:
>All these in combination you end with a reasonable reply to HTML emails.
>The downside is that you don't get to keep the original email unless you
>make a copy of it and it's fairly hacky.
Thanks for all
In message <20190627125114.70a3921...@orac.inputplus.co.uk>,
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>Revisiting once again the issue of nice text from horrible HTML emails...
And here, all this time, I thought that it was just me! I assumed
that I had just failed to read the documentation well enough or long
In message <20190624194941.27d7466...@pb-smtp21.pobox.com>,
Ken Hornstein wrote:
>Here's the new message:
>
>post: problem initializing server; [BHST] Connection to "localhost:587"
>failed: Connection refused
Looks good to me!
--
nmh-workers
In message <20190618082510.6ca7521...@orac.inputplus.co.uk>,
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>Port 587 is the `submission' port. It sounds like your Postfix isn't
>listening on that...
You're right, That's it in a nutshell. I confess that I didn't
even consider the possibility that nmh would be using
My apologies for posting here without actually being an NHM "worker".
I hope you folks won't begrudge me too much for doing so, even though
this may turn out to be a "support" type question.
've recently been upgrading an ancinet old FreeBSD 9.1 system to FreeBSD
12.0. In the process, I am
I just wanted to thank you guys who responded to my request for
advice.
I think that I'm going to have to think about this all some more.
When I posted, I neglected to mention that getting all my mail
to flow the way I want it may perhaps be complicated by the fact
that I have multiple domains,
Greetings,
I'm in the process of trying to move all of my DNS, HTTP, FTP and SMTP
stuff off of my crusty old static-IP DSL line and over to a virtual
machine elsewhere. Once I finish this process, my intention is to
tell my DSL provider to cancel out my static IP and convert me to
an ordinary
In message candwyvf8u9b+busr5qkmfcux7skoov8+vowc47sg0yqmky7...@mail.gmail.com
Earl Hood e...@earlhood.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
This all suits me and my preferences perfectly. The only problem
is that I have only been able to figure out how
In message 20130216223055.9b6af360...@charybdis.ellipsis.cx,
Joel Uckelman uckel...@nomic.net wrote:
Thus spake Ronald F. Guilmette:
For example, I've had this spam-filing recipe in my .procmailrc for ages:
:0w: Mail/sp/$LOCKEXT
* ^X-Bogosity: Spam, tests=bogofilter
| /usr/libexec/nmh
For my purposes, it would be extraordinarily helpful if, in the
next release, the -file option for the inc command would accept
as its argument some sort of magic token which would serve to
represent stdin. (By tradition, in many other programs this is
most often represented by a single dash.)
In message 20130215220128.1c444c...@db.pthbb.org,
Jerrad Pierce belg4...@pthbb.org wrote:
The normal way to handle your second problem is to set $MHCONTEXT
OK. To what?
for the scope of your script.
I don't understand. Please elaborate.
Admittedly, this is not listed prominently
in an
In message 20130215220249.20dec360...@charybdis.ellipsis.cx,
Joel Uckelman uckel...@nomic.net wrote:
Thus spake Ronald F. Guilmette:
I am signed up for many mailing lists, including this one, which
I do not actually read on a routine basis, but which I like to
archive locally using
In message 201203160123.q2g1nay7018...@darkstar.fourwinds.com,
Jon Steinhart j...@fourwinds.com wrote:
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu writes:
--==_Exmh_1331860781_2149P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:02:48 PDT, Jon Steinhart said:
And yes, having defaults
In message 201203160200.q2g20jwt032...@hedwig.cmf.nrl.navy.mil,
Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote:
Full disclosure: I am using NMH version 1.3. Alas, version 1.4 has not
been ported to FreeBSD yet. (Is this the real root of the problem?)
When you say not ported ... do you mean, It doesn't
In message 201203160209.q2g29b1w019...@darkstar.fourwinds.com,
Jon Steinhart j...@fourwinds.com wrote:
Please excuse my ignorance here. What killed x-?
If anybody happens to know, I'd also like very much to find out who killed
Rosie Larsen.
Regards,
rfg
Sorry. I feel sure that this must be an FAQ, but how does one get this
message to go away, you know, so that I can actually send an attachment?
___
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
In message 4f61a9c7.26063c0a.6da5.3...@mx.google.com, you wrote:
Ronald F. Guilmette writes:
Ummm... Well, now at least the failure message is different...
What now? attach four-leaf.jpg
What now? s
mhbuild: draft shouldn't contain MIME-Version: field
31 matches
Mail list logo
