Re: [Nmh-workers] Documenting @folder WAS Re: relative message numbers?

2012-12-02 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi David, Is `scan +/tmp/foo' documented anywhere, i.e. the ability to treat any directory as a folder, not just one under Path? And `@..' after that.. How's this: Commands which take a folder name (inc, refile, scan, sortm, ...) Three's enough? (inc, refile, scan...)?

Re: [Nmh-workers] Documenting @folder WAS Re: relative message numbers?

2012-11-30 Thread David Levine
Is `scan +/tmp/foo' documented anywhere, i.e. the ability to treat any directory as a folder, not just one under Path? And `@..' after that.. Doh. Was planned but slipped my mind. Here are revised versions. 1) Insert into nmh.1 near: Commands which take a message number as an

[Nmh-workers] Documenting @folder WAS Re: relative message numbers?

2012-10-16 Thread Jerrad Pierce
Is `scan +/tmp/foo' documented anywhere, i.e. the ability to treat any directory as a folder, not just one under Path? And `@..' after that.. Doh. Was planned but slipped my mind. Here are revised versions. 1) Insert into nmh.1 near: Commands which take a message number as an argument (