Re: [Nmh-workers] Meaning of "+." or "+.."

2007-02-28 Thread Sean Kamath
Joel Reicher wrote: I've looked at the code now and it's quite clear that the meaning of a folderspec beginning with either dot or double dot is relative to the current working directory, not the Path: profile entry. Does anyone know why or have thoughts on whether these semantics should be kept

Re: [Nmh-workers] Meaning of "+." or "+.."

2007-02-27 Thread Jerrad Pierce
>I've looked at the code now and it's quite clear that the meaning of >a folderspec beginning with either dot or double dot is relative to >the current working directory, not the Path: profile entry. I've not used these forms of + (nobody on the list seems to use these [odd] undocumented constructs

[Nmh-workers] Meaning of "+." or "+.."

2007-02-27 Thread Joel Reicher
I've looked at the code now and it's quite clear that the meaning of a folderspec beginning with either dot or double dot is relative to the current working directory, not the Path: profile entry. Does anyone know why or have thoughts on whether these semantics should be kept? It seems very delibe