Ken Hornstein wrote:
I have mail stored on an IMAP server. I think it's perfectly
reasonable that I should be able to do scan +IMAP:inbox (or however
you want to indicate that a particular folder is on an IMAP server; I
Why not extend that to +mbox:inbox for mbox folders?
Seriously, though,
Thus spake Nathan Bailey:
Robert Elz wrote:
We get offered glimpses from time to time of Jerry Peek's extensive
collection of MH add-ons - that is the kind of thing that makes MH
worth using.
[ Further nifty examples snip'd ]
Shouldn't we start an MH wiki? It would be great to see
Nathan Bailey wrote:
PS: Another couple of things I'd like to see on the MH wiki would be:
i) How do you do 'To/Cc/Dcc/Bcc' field completion? (i.e. in the same way
the GUI clients do, or web browsers do for URLs). Special bonus if your
solution supports an LDAP directory (i.e. not just
Robert Elz wrote:
I can't speak to your comfort level, but accessing the files directly
is necessary for some usages, and definitely part of what MH offers.
aye, laddie (doing my best Cmdr. Montgomery Scott impression)
when i had to implement a mandatory document retention policy for
This is flamebait, shame on you.
I disagree; I thought it was relatively straightforward, and not intended
as flamebait at all.
I have mail stored on an IMAP server. I think it's perfectly
reasonable that I should be able to do scan +IMAP:inbox (or however
you want to indicate that a
I have mail stored on an IMAP server. I think it's perfectly
reasonable that I should be able to do scan +IMAP:inbox (or however
you want to indicate that a particular folder is on an IMAP server; I
Why not extend that to +mbox:inbox for mbox folders?
If someone wanted to do that, more power
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Igor Sobrado writes:
Why is specifying more than one folder concurrently not possible?
Is it a security feature?
In other words, I believe that I am asking about using a more flexible
getopt(3)-like function with support for the + syntax. I suppose
that there is
Ken Hornstein wrote:
I have mail stored on an IMAP server. I think it's perfectly
reasonable that I should be able to do scan +IMAP:inbox (or
however you want to indicate that a particular folder is on an IMAP
server; I
Oliver Kiddle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not extend that to
If we're going to go through the trouble of cleaning up the codebase,
we should really have a test framework. I'd like to start in on such
a beast.
Does anyone have suggestions about how that should be done?
(E.g., acceptance tests would be easiest to do in something other
than C. It would be
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tethys writes:
Joel Uckelman writes:
(E.g., acceptance tests would be easiest to do in something other
than C. It would be good if those were done in whatever language
people were most likely to contribute tests in. So what language?)
Bourne shell. It may
10 matches
Mail list logo
