Re: [Nmh-workers] fgets bug in mhbuildsbr.c

2005-05-12 Thread Josh Bressers
I patched my version of mhbuildsbr.c by adding a wrapper to fgets th at determines the proper number of characters read in. Then I changed the for loop to make use of this information instead of simply looking for the first 0x00 character. This is probably an inefficient

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development

2005-05-12 Thread Ken Hornstein
it sounds like a couple of people have some fresh or renewed energy for making progress. given that, it would be really really great if this thread didn't die off like others like it in the past. to keep the rest of us from waiting in suspense, are ken and jon working out a new maintenance

Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: nmh current development

2005-05-12 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 11 May 2005 16:03:26 PDT, Bill Wohler said: The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.mail.nmh.devel as well. Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 10:13:52AM -0400, Peter Galbraith wrote: As a note of

[Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was nmh current development)

2005-05-12 Thread Chad Walstrom
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 04:03:26PM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote: Hi Chad, I don't quite read that. Should I be laughing, crying, or smiling contently? ;-) Heh. Way back in the day, I used to be an emacs nut. In fact, while using Microsoft Word to write tech docs at my first job, I often printed

Re: [Nmh-workers] (OT) On the road to vi... (was nmh current development)

2005-05-12 Thread Ken Hornstein
Hey guys, can we concentrate on more important things ... like making fun of all of those losers who are using mutt? :-) hey, not so fast! i was just starting to enjoy being on a list where at least one other person uses vi, and likes it... ;-) I was just (gently) point out that ragging on