Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour

2007-03-31 Thread Jerrad Pierce
>> Strange. I see aliases expanded in the "fcc:" copy. >So do I. I said "local user names". "ralph" isn't an alias, it's a >user in /etc/passwd. forwarding on an fcc copy leaves it as a plain Yes, you did. When in fact, what you meant was non-fully qualified addresses. There is very much a diff

Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour

2007-03-31 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Neil, > > Besides, I've always found fcc useless. It doesn't expand local > > user names, e.g. `to: ralph' stays like that instead of becoming > > `to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]', and there's no message-id which is > > vital for referring someone back to an earlier email. I dcc myself > > and file t

Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour

2007-03-31 Thread Joel Reicher
> I see a > message-id header. The message-id header results from "send: -msgid" > in my profile. I get the feeling this might be catching many people, and my preference would be to put "-msgid" in the defaults for "send". I think it makes more sense for the software constructing the message to c