[Nmh-workers] NMH long lines

2012-02-20 Thread mark.wake
I see this has been covered in some detail but I really need to know if there's an override for the 998 character line limit when building a message for sending? We're attempting to migrate to nmh for a production system and the current one allows lines of apparent unlimited length - is there an

Re: [Nmh-workers] NMH long lines

2012-02-20 Thread Ken Hornstein
I see this has been covered in some detail but I really need to know if there's an override for the 998 character line limit when building a message for sending? We're attempting to migrate to nmh for a production system and the current one allows lines of apparent unlimited length - is there an

Re: [Nmh-workers] NMH long lines

2012-02-20 Thread mark.wake
Hi Ken, Apologies for the vagueness. By current one I'm referring to our existing X400 gateway accessed via Clearswift MTA software, with SMTP conversion done by a third party. Our belief now is that at some point in that submission processes the lines are split with CR/LF under the

Re: [Nmh-workers] NMH long lines

2012-02-20 Thread Ken Hornstein
Apologies for the vagueness. By current one I'm referring to our existing X400 gateway accessed via Clearswift MTA software, with SMTP conversion done by a third party. Our belief now is that at some point in that submission processes the lines are split with CR/LF under the Clearswift route,

Re: [Nmh-workers] NMH long lines

2012-02-20 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi, Ken wrote: - Are you sure nmh is generating the exclamation marks as the line delimiters? sendmail(8) can split lines that are too long in this manner. The L= parameter in the mailer definition can be altered to lengthen it but that's not wise; it's only *your* sendmail that's being

Re: [Nmh-workers] NMH long lines

2012-02-20 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:41:52 GMT, Ralph Corderoy said: Alexander Zangerl wrote: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary4345720567471976529== Does anyone else have trouble displaying the meat of this email with nmh? For whatever it's worth, exmh didn't have any trouble with

[Nmh-workers] Fedora RPMs

2012-02-20 Thread Joel Uckelman
Who builds the nmh RPMs for Fedora? I upgraded the machine where I use nmh to Fedora 16 over the weekend, but the version of nmh I get is 1.3-4. Also, I'd like to nudge whomever it was that said they were thinking of packaging par... -- J. ___

Re: [Nmh-workers] Fedora RPMs

2012-02-20 Thread David Levine
Joel wrote: Thus spake Ken Hornstein: Who builds the nmh RPMs for Fedora? I upgraded the machine where I use nmh to Fedora 16 over the weekend, but the version of nmh I get is 1.3-4. According to the Interwebs it looks like it was ... Josh Bressers, maybe? At least he's listed in

Re: [Nmh-workers] NMH long lines

2012-02-20 Thread Ken Hornstein
The long lines are being produced by a bespoke C process, running on Solaris, and the data is EDIFact formatted. These output files are fine up until the point I call mhmail and by the time it gets through our Exchange gateway it comes back with exclamation marks in it ~every 998 characters.

Re: [Nmh-workers] Fedora RPMs

2012-02-20 Thread Josh Bressers
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Josh Bressers j...@bress.net wrote: Sorry for the confusion. I submitted an update shortly after 1.4 came out, but it got stuck (and I didn't notice). It should show up in the next day or two. I'll be sure this doesn't happen again. Also, since there are