Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF-8 message bodies

2012-05-31 Thread Aleksander Matuszak
Ken Hornstein writes: It is possible to keep almost unchanged state with addition of one more clause to mhbuild like pair #off #on which marks the region where ^# is not interpreted as directive. But to me it seems dumb that # characters can't be in the beginning of a line, and having

[Nmh-workers] replyfilter

2012-05-31 Thread Kevin Cosgrove
Hi, I've been using the combination of a replyfilter with the suggested mhl.repl.replyfilter and the entry of a referencing formatproc in ~/.mh_profile, and all is quite nice indeed. In fact I'm REALLY happy with nmh 1.5 RC? and exmh 2.8.0+RC? But, some of the time the 'par' call within the

Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF-8 message bodies

2012-05-31 Thread Ken Hornstein
Suppose, you use automimeproc: 1 and you want to include (as a part of the message) some lines from program source, shell script or whatever. [...] I understood what you meant fine; I just think you misunderstand me. My basic proposal is: - Make automimeproc: 1 be turned on always - Make it so

Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF-8 message bodies

2012-05-31 Thread Paul Fox
aleksander wrote: Ken Hornstein writes: It is possible to keep almost unchanged state with addition of one more clause to mhbuild like pair #off #on which marks the region where ^# is not interpreted as directive. But to me it seems dumb that # characters can't be in the

Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF-8 message bodies

2012-05-31 Thread Paul Fox
ken wrote: to answer ken's question: i use automimeproc for the directives, and am willing to reformat mail slightly to move leading '#' characters when i get errors[1][2]. and i prefer not to have to type mime at the whatnow prompt, because i'm sure it would result in my recipients

Re: [Nmh-workers] replyfilter

2012-05-31 Thread Kevin Cosgrove
On 31 May 2012 at 8:13, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: I like par fine and I'm glad it has a man page ... but it's damn near incomprehensible. Yes, it reads more as a software specification than instructions for use. It reminds me of a Super Compact manual, with entries like: run

Re: [Nmh-workers] [PATCH] mhbuild: implement #on/#off/#pop, and the -[no]directives switch

2012-05-31 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Paul, +static void directive_onoff(int onoff) +{ +if (directives_index = sizeof(directives_stack)) { + fprintf(stderr, mhbuild: #on/off overflow, continuing\n); + return; +} +directives_stack[++directives_index] = onoff; +} I think the test is wrong. If 31 = 32 is

Re: [Nmh-workers] [PATCH] mhbuild: implement #on/#off/#pop, and the -[no]directives switch

2012-05-31 Thread Paul Fox
ralph wrote: Hi Paul, +static void directive_onoff(int onoff) +{ +if (directives_index = sizeof(directives_stack)) { + fprintf(stderr, mhbuild: #on/off overflow, continuing\n); + return; +} +directives_stack[++directives_index] = onoff; +} I think