Re: [Nmh-workers] strncpy(3), die, die, die.

Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > Paul Vixie wrote: > |... > > I think the former and latter of the above have the problem that > they return useless information: the size that would be necessary > to store the result in a non-truncated form. If that information > would be

Re: [Nmh-workers] strncpy(3), die, die, die.

Paul Vixie wrote: |Ralph Corderoy wrote: |> Perhaps a complainant could be told of the secret $NMHNOBARF to stop |> TRUNCCPY from aborting? Though it would still complain for the first N |> goes? | |i think the moment that the state of the program becomes undefined, you